Pre-nups or any agreement entered into before, during or after a marriage or defacto relationship, when properly prepared and executed, can give parties some comfort about how their assets are likely to be divided (if at all) in the event of a separation.

Once signed, after both parties have had the benefit of independent legal advice, a Financial Agreement (including a pre-nup ) is and remains binding and enforceable unless the parties agree in writing to terminate it, or the agreement is set aside by the Court.

There can be no guarantee that one of the separated parties might not make a future application to the Court to seek to set the agreement aside, with a view to obtaining a larger property settlement or spousal maintenance package. Whilst there is no way of making a financial agreement “watertight” (that is, absolutely excluding a set aside application), an experienced and qualified family law practitioners we will guide and advise you about the best way to protect your interests in the future.

The recent High Court decision in Thorne and Kennedy (8 November 2017) has not changed or expanded the grounds upon which a party can seek to set an agreement aside. However, the decision highlights that the overarching fairness or otherwise of the terms of the agreement may be one factor (amongst a number and range of factors) that may be taken into account if one party makes an application to set the agreement aside.

The Court, in deciding whether or not a Financial Agreement should be set aside, may also look at factors such as whether the agreement was offered on the basis that the terms were not open for negotiation (that is, on a “take it or leave it” basis), the nature of the parties’ relationship and their respective financial positions, the emotional circumstances in which the agreement was entered including any threat to end a relationship, engagement or marriage if the agreement is not signed and whether there has been time for the parties to carefully reflect and consider both the agreement and the independent legal advice they had received before signing the agreement.

In Thorne and Kennedy the High Court was satisfied that the agreement should be set aside as it had been procured by undue influence and unconscionable conduct; that is the Wife did not enter into the agreement of her own free will and she was under a special disadvantage (including by reason of circumstances created and exacerbated by the husband) and it was wrong of the husband to knowingly have her sign the agreement.

Like all aspects of Family Law, each and every Financial Agreement is unique to the parties who seek to enter into it and should be carefully and cautiously drafted and tailored to best meet those parties’ needs.

 

If you would like to discuss this further, please do not hesitate to contact a member of our Family Law Team.

Related Articles

View All
Family Law / Family Law Advice

Lunar New Year: Good Luck and Misfortune (and Windfalls in Family Law)

As we welcome the auspicious Year of the Ox, some may be tempted to seek their fortune by purchasing a lottery ticket...
Read More
Family Law / Family Law Advice

I want my child to be vaccinated against COVID-19 – but my ex does not agree… What do I do?

  On 7 January 2021, the Australian Government announced its national roll-out strategy for the COVID-19 vaccine...
Read More
Family Law / Family Law Advice

When can I apply for a Divorce after I have separated? Does a Divorce impact on my property settlement?

There are very particular requirements that need to be met for a Divorce Order to be made by the Court However, if all...
Read More
Family Law / Family Law Advice

Who buys the blazer? Back to school child support issues

Of course, parents can come to their own arrangements about these issues and both parties have a financial obligation...
Read More
Family Law / Family Law Advice

Family Law Update – Expanded COVID-19 List

The criteria for the list has been expanded to those family law matters which have been directly and indirectly...
Read More
Family Law

United Nation’s International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women

On 7 February 2000, the General Assembly of the United Nations officially designated 25 November 2020 as the...
Read More
Family Law / Family Law Advice

Family Law Court Filing Deadlines for Parenting Applications

However before we close the door on 2020 and move onwards and upwards towards a (hopefully) brighter 2021, it is...
Read More
Family Law

Family Law Announcement – National Arbitration List

This is an electronic list in each Court which is managed by specific Judges depending on the nature of the application...
Read More
Family Law

Family Violence Intervention Orders & Family Law and the Pandemic

The Stage 4 restrictions in Melbourne, and Stage 3 restrictions in regional Victoria, and the Stay at Home Directions...
Read More
Family Law

Am I able to use recordings in parenting disputes before the Family Law Courts?

Background In the recent case of Nagel & Clay [2020] FamCA 326, involving a parenting and property dispute, listed...
Read More
Family Law

Parenting and COVID-19 – Pandell & Walburg

In the recent case of Pandell & Walburg (No 2) (2020) the mother withheld the four year old child from all...
Read More
Family Law

Binding Child Support Agreements during the Pandemic – Are they enforceable?

Background The parties met and commenced their relationship in 2005, married in 2007 and separated in or around...
Read More