By Aaron van der Heyden

20 September 2016

The use of social media is prolific in Australian society. As of January 2016, approximately 15 million Australians have Facebook accounts from a total population of 24 million people. Instagram has 5 million monthly active users, and 3.7 million Australians are members of LinkedIn.¹ Social media use has become part of our routine; whether a quick scroll through your news feed whilst on the morning commute, or checking in on your buddy’s activities when winding down at night. It is the forum through which we announce most things, from where we dined for dinner, to life milestones such as engagements, birthdays, and new relationships.

Inevitably, social media may also play a role at the end of a relationship, in our increasingly modern world. There can be serious implications from posting every aspect of your life following a separation, which is often not experienced until the material is well and truly in the hands of the Court.

In the case of Dautry & Wemple², the Federal Circuit Court noted that:

“the Court regularly warns litigants about the use of social media and the ready access by others to it…Making information available through social media necessarily involves, if not invites, others having access to it.”

Accordingly, there will be many adjustments that you will need to make in your life following separation. Lawyers will advise you about such changes pertaining to your property holdings, bank balances, or the time that you spend with your children. We will also advise you about the changes that may need to be made to the way in which you communicate with your former partner; and use of social media is no exception.

Your social media activity in the period following separation and prior to finalising your matters with your former partner should be carefully considered. In most circumstances, posts relating to your former partner, family, relationships, finances or your separation will no longer be appropriate. Otherwise, you may find that the post about your new expensive handbag, five star trip to Europe, or recent big night out, will be attached to an Affidavit and filed with the Court. As set out in the case of Dautry, social media posts are a widely used and accepted form of evidence.

Further, the way in which you communicate information to your former partner deserves careful thought during this emotional period. Updating your relationship status and posting a cute picture with your new partner may not be best the way to inform your former spouse that you are in a new relationship. The way in which you communicate information can have an enormous indirect impact on the resolution of your financial matters and parenting matters.

You will also need to contemplate whether uploading posts about your children are appropriate. Is this something that you and your former partner were formerly comfortable to post, or will such posts and references to children on the internet be an issue, giving rise to further dispute? The Family Court has demonstrated that it will readily make an Order to prohibit parties from posting about issues arising in the proceedings or uploading photos of children who are the subject of proceedings.³

¹ http://www.socialmedianews.com.au/social-media-statistics-australia-january-2016/
² [2015] FCCA 943
³ Hermann v Hermann [2014] FamCA 213

Related Articles

View All
Family Law

Spousal Maintenance Claims and the Case of Elei & Dodt: The Importance of Crossing your T’s and Dodting your Eleis

In a recent appeal case released under the pseudonym, Elei & Dodt [2018], Justice Ryan considered whether the...
Read More
Family Law

Do you have a Child Support Debt? Be Aware of International Travel Bans

A DPO is an international travel ban, which gives Border Force the power to stop a person who owes child support at the...
Read More
Australia-Israel Legal Advice / Charities & Not-for-Profit / Technology and Start Ups

TLFC – Award Finalist for Law Firm of the Year (Medium Category)

Tisher Liner FC are proud to be nominated as an award finalist in the 14th annual Victorian Legal Awards Medium Law...
Read More
Family Law

Avoiding the ‘Perennial Football Match’: When Can Final Parenting Orders be Changed?

The principle, borne from the 1978 case of Rice v Asplund, is that the Court can only revisit final parenting orders...
Read More
Family Law

Private School Fees – Who Pays Post-Separation?

Private school expenses includes fees, levies and charges, camps, excursions, computers/devices, books, stationery,...
Read More
Family Law

What did you call me? The process of changing a child’s name at law

One common example is when the mother retains primary care of a child who has historically carried the father’s...
Read More
Family Law

Family Law Update: Pre-nups are not dead

Once signed, after both parties have had the benefit of independent legal advice, a Financial Agreement (including a...
Read More
Family Law

“Clean Hands” in Family Law

If you have separated from your spouse, you may feel that your financial affairs are no longer any of your spouse’s...
Read More
Family Law

Family Law settlement includes assets acquired post-separation

The Husband received an inheritance, four years after separation, from his late father’s estate The value of the...
Read More
Family Law

Should You Post It?

Some judges have commented, “We’re not running a Facebook Court”, “This is not reality TV This is real life and...
Read More
Family Law

Post-separation spending: What will it really cost you?

When parties to a relationship separate, there generally follows the uncertain period of time where each party is...
Read More
Family Law

When can the kids decide?

Although children’s wishes are relevant, they are not determinative That is, children do not and should not have the...
Read More