By Briana Kotzapavlidis

9 August 2017

Social media is being used as evidence in Family Law cases, particularly in parenting cases with increasing frequency. The use of social media as evidence is particularly prevalent in high conflict cases.

Some judges have commented, “We’re not running a Facebook Court”, “This is not reality TV. This is real life and the best interest of the child are paramount[i], and “I really do not care what people post on their own Facebooks (sic), to be frank[ii], indicating that the Court would be likely to have little, if any regard, for what parties post on social media.

However, there is a significant (and increasing) number of cases in which social media has been adduced as evidence and successfully relied upon in parenting cases. For example, in one case in which a mother denied that she had re-partnered, her Facebook relationship status (“engaged”) and posts about her “fiancé” (endorsed with the mother’s “thumbs-up” symbol) were relied upon as evidence[iii]. The mother asserted that it was all a joke but in cross-examination, when presented with her Facebook post in which she wrote, “whatever looks better for me in Court”, the mother conceded that it was probably true that she would say things to make her case look better.

Facebook and Twitter posts have also been used in parenting cases about:-

  • Parenting responsibility and care arrangements; where a father’s post (although taken down after 12 minutes when he realised “the error of his ways”) was admitted as evidence which was relevant to his attitude toward the mother and what the mother asserted was the father’s “emotional immaturity”[iv].

 

  • Specific orders, including a restraint against the mother allowing the children referring to her new partner as “dad” or “daddy”. In that case, a large volume of Facebook entries (both by the mother and her new partner) were adduced as evidence. Noting that posts by the mother’s partner were “appalling” and “threatening”, the Court took a particularly dim view of “the offensive nature of (the mother’s) stupid Facebook posts”, which the Court found demonstrated the mother’s immaturity and lack of emotional self control[v];

 

  • Relocation, where an exchange on Facebook was used as evidence between the parties that there was agreement between them that one parent could relocate with the child[vi];

 

  • Contravention; where a posted photograph of a parent and child at the beach was used as evidence that the child’s time with the parent did not take place at the Court ordered location and with a supervisor present[vii];

 

  • Costs; where a mother’s Facebook posts were held to prove her intention to deliberately, by her conduct, “run up” the father’s legal costs and as a result a costs order was made against her[viii];

 

Social media, as well as other forms of electronic communication including FaceTime, Skype, Whats App, text and instant messaging, is often used successfully by parents as an efficient means of communication. However, parents should be aware of the broad reaching affect of social media and the extent to which a post, “like”, uploaded photograph or status update might be used as evidence in their case.

Whilst to date, most of the cases in which social media has been used as evidence relate to parenting, there is no reason why “posts” or “tweets” about a new car or boat, the sale of an asset for a great price, a new job or business venture might not be adduced as evidence in a property or financial case.

For more information on this and other family law matters, please contact a member of our Family Law Team.

 

[i] Per Baumann FM (as His Honour then was), “Facebook posts used as ammunition in Family Court Disputes”, The Courier-Mail, Sunday Mail, 13 May 2012
[ii] Per Brown FM (as His Honour then was), Vecchi & Vecchi (2009) FMCAfam (18 December 2009)
[iii] Mallery & London [2012] FMCAfam 145
[iv] Whitehouse & Whitehouse [2015] FCCA 3621
[v] Doonan & Bradshaw [2014] FCCA 2666
[vi] Department of Communities & Compton [2010] FamCA 711
[vii] Wadmal & Amrita (No.2) [2008] FamCA 1062
[viii] Rose & Barwon (No.2) [2010] FamCA 738

 

Related Articles

View All
Family Law

Private School Fees – Who Pays Post-Separation?

Private school expenses includes fees, levies and charges, camps, excursions, computers/devices, books, stationery,...
Read More
Family Law

What did you call me? The process of changing a child’s name at law

One common example is when the mother retains primary care of a child who has historically carried the father’s...
Read More
Family Law

Family Law Update: Pre-nups are not dead

Once signed, after both parties have had the benefit of independent legal advice, a Financial Agreement (including a...
Read More
Family Law

“Clean Hands” in Family Law

If you have separated from your spouse, you may feel that your financial affairs are no longer any of your spouse’s...
Read More
Family Law

Family Law settlement includes assets acquired post-separation

The recent Full Court decision in Calvin & McTier affirmed the Court’s power to divide and/or include for...
Read More
Family Law

Post-separation spending: What will it really cost you?

When parties to a relationship separate, there generally follows the uncertain period of time where each party is...
Read More
Family Law

When can the kids decide?

Although children’s wishes are relevant, they are not determinative That is, children do not and should not have the...
Read More
Family Law

Are child support agreements set in stone?

Parties can enter into a Limited Child Support Agreement (say for a few years) or a Binding Child Support Agreement,...
Read More
Family Law

Are you in a de facto relationship?

To be eligible to seek property or financial orders as a de facto under the Family Law Act, the parties must have been...
Read More
Family Law

Super-what? Supervision Explained

There are often disputes in respect of parenting arrangements However, sometimes these disputes extend to one party...
Read More
Family Law

Brangelina “Filed for Divorce”. But What Does This Mean?

So, what does the term “filing for divorce” actually mean here in Australia People often believe divorce is...
Read More