By Michael Fetter

16 August 2017

The Fair Work Commission (Commission) will introduce a “ casual conversion ” clause into modern awards following a recent Full Bench decision. This clause may allow casual, award covered employees to request permanent employment. This change will have significant impact on employers as their ability to refuse a request for permanent employment may be limited.

In summary, the Commission decision means:

  • Casual employees may request conversion to an equivalent full-time or part-time position;
  • The casual employees must satisfy a qualifying period of twelve (12) months employment prior to making the request; and
  • The casual employee must satisfy criteria by maintaining a pattern of hours which, without significant adjustment, could continue under permanent full-time or part-time employment.


To refuse a request, the employer must establish:

  • That a significant adjustment to working hours would have to be made to accommodate the conversion;
  • The casual position is likely to end within twelve (12) months;
  • The hours of work for the casual position will significantly change or be reduced within twelve (12) months; and
  • Any other reasonable grounds (based on the facts) which are known or reasonably foreseeable.


Employers must provide casual employees with a copy of the casual conversion requirement within 12 months of employment. A casual employee whose request is refused may apply to the dispute resolution procedure of a modern award.

Note that casual employees typically receive a casual loading of approximately 20-25%. This loading is designed to compensate employees for leave entitlements that casual employees do not receive. Casual employees that elect to convert to a permanent employment arrangement will receive a reduced hourly wage in recognition of the abolition of the casual loading.

The Commission has not yet determined when the casual conversion clause will be adopted.

How will this impact Employers?

Casual conversion means that employers will have to:

  • Ensure that all casual employees are notified of their rights under the casual conversion provision;
  • Make provision and set policy to accommodate requests made by casual employees for permanent employment;
  • Determine the number of employees impacted by the change and who;
  • Update applicable policies and procedures to ensure compliance;
  • Consider if employers can refuse a request and why (see above); and
  • Comply with the casual conversion as non-compliance may constitute a breach of the Fair Work Act and/or the applicable award.


At this point, the changes only relate to modern award employees – who constitute only around 15% of the workforce.


If you are an employer and would like more information regarding these changes, please contact Michael Fetter or a member of our Employment Law team.

Related Articles

View All
Employment Law / Small to Medium Enterprises

Full Federal Court allows double dipping for casual employees

Justice Bromberg and the Full Federal Court of Australia have once again delivered bad news for employers  In certain...
Read More
Employment Law / Small to Medium Enterprises / Start-ups & Emerging Enterprises

Fair Work Commission amends 99 Awards during COVID-19 Pandemic

On Wednesday, 8 April 2020, as a result of the COVID-19 Pandemic, a six (6) member Fair Work Commission full bench,...
Read More
Employment Law

New industrial manslaughter laws are no laughing matter for employers

What are the laws The new laws will be applicable to all employers, self-employed individuals and officers of a company...
Read More
Employment Law / Commercial Law / Litigation & Dispute Resolution

What employers need to know when letting someone go

A staff member may need to be let go because the business can no longer afford them, or perhaps they are just not...
Read More
Employment Law / Litigation & Dispute Resolution / Intellectual Property

Dude, Where’s my Business? High Court Delivers Warning to Employees and Competitors who engage in Dishonest Conduct to Get Ahead in the Game

The case of Ancient Foresters in Victoria Friendly Society Limited v Lifeplan Australia Friendly Society Limited [2018]...
Read More
Employment Law / Litigation & Dispute Resolution / Construction

Does it Really Matter What You Call Your Employees? The Difference Between a Permanent and a Casual Employee.

The Federal Court found the casual employee worked a regular and continuous pattern of work for more than two years,...
Read More
Commercial Law / Construction / Employment Law

September 2018 Newsletter

September 2018 Newsletter See the full newsletter here Welcome TLFC Law are pleased to welcome Min Seetoh to the...
Read More
Commercial Law / Employment Law / Real Estate Agents

Are you complying with the Real Estate Industry Award? Don’t get caught out!

Changes to the Real Estate Industry Award 2010 Important changes to the Award include: Classification of employees and...
Read More
Not-for-Profit & Charities / Technology and Start Ups / Adverse Possession

TLFC – Award Finalist for Law Firm of the Year (Medium Category)

Tisher Liner FC are proud to be nominated as an award finalist in the 14th annual Victorian Legal Awards Medium Law...
Read More
Employment Law

First they came for the accountants…

With several popular restaurants recently making headlines for allegedly underpaying employees, it is a good time for...
Read More
Employment Law

How discretionary are “Discretionary Employee Payments”?

These policies (or contacts of employment themselves) may incorporate a statement to the effect that these are ex...
Read More