By Simon Abraham

23 August 2017

With several popular restaurants recently making headlines for allegedly underpaying employees, it is a good time for employers – and also their accountants and bookkeepers – to consider their potential exposure to a Fair Work claim.

In a recent decision of the Federal Circuit Court in Fair Work Ombudsman v Blue Impression Pty Ltd & Ors [2017] FCCA 810, the Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) prosecuted the owner of a Melbourne fast food restaurant for alleged contraventions of the Fair Work Act 2009 – including contraventions for failing to pay the minimum hourly rate and failing to pay weekend and penalty rates.

However, the FWO also went after the third party accounting firm who provided payroll services for the restaurant. The FWO argued that the accounting firm was an “accessory” to the restaurant owner’s contraventions pursuant to section 550 of the Fair Work Act, on the basis that the accounting firm “aided, abetted, counselled or procured the relevant contraventions”.

The accounting firm argued that its scope of work was merely a “data entry” job to process the payroll – it was not involved in the hiring process, it had no authority to decide what the employees were paid, and it did not have any legal expertise to give any advice about minimum wage requirements under the relevant Award.

Nevertheless, the Federal Circuit Court rejected the accounting firm’s arguments and found that the accountant clearly knew the employees were likely being underpaid, but chose to be “wilfully blind” to his client’s Fair Work Act contraventions.

As an accessory to a Fair Work Act contravention, the accounting firm became subject to the same penalties as the restaurant owner – up to 60 penalty units (currently $12,600) per contravention. In the Blue Impression case, the FWO alleged the accounting firm had been involved in seven contraventions for this single client of the firm.

The decision in the Blue Impression case is the first time that the FWO has successfully prosecuted a third party advisor as an accessory to a Fair Work Act contravention. This has set the precedent for the FWO to potentially link an accountant or payroll manager to almost any Fair Work Act contravention proceeding – and we are certainly seeing the FWO do so in some recent cases.

Furthermore, employers, accountants and payroll managers should be particularly mindful of the Fair Work Amendment (Protecting Vulnerable Workers) Bill 2017, which has been proposed as part of the current government’s election promise to “protect vulnerable workers”. The bill is presently being debated in parliament, and if it is passed, the maximum penalties for each Fair Work Act contravention is expected to increase tenfold from up to 60 penalty units ($12,600) per contravention to up to 600 penalty units ($126,000) per contravention.

For further information and advice on employment law matters, please contact a member of our Employment Law team.

Related Articles

View All
Employment Law

When can I direct an employee to get the COVID-19 jab and what can I do if they refuse?

FWO further guidance The FWO has now provided further guidance in relation to when it is lawful and reasonable for an...
Read More
Employment Law

Can an employer force an employee to get the COVID-19 jab?

This question is topical given recent discussions around the roll out of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine in Australia and...
Read More
Employment Law / Small to Medium Enterprises

Full Federal Court allows double dipping for casual employees

Justice Bromberg and the Full Federal Court of Australia have once again delivered bad news for employers  In certain...
Read More
Employment Law / Small to Medium Enterprises / Start-ups & Emerging Enterprises

Fair Work Commission amends 99 Awards during COVID-19 Pandemic

On Wednesday, 8 April 2020, as a result of the COVID-19 Pandemic, a six (6) member Fair Work Commission full bench,...
Read More
Employment Law

New industrial manslaughter laws are no laughing matter for employers

What are the laws The new laws will be applicable to all employers, self-employed individuals and officers of a company...
Read More
Employment Law / Commercial Law / Litigation & Dispute Resolution

What employers need to know when letting someone go

A staff member may need to be let go because the business can no longer afford them, or perhaps they are just not...
Read More
Employment Law / Litigation & Dispute Resolution / Intellectual Property

Dude, Where’s my Business? High Court Delivers Warning to Employees and Competitors who engage in Dishonest Conduct to Get Ahead in the Game

The case of Ancient Foresters in Victoria Friendly Society Limited v Lifeplan Australia Friendly Society Limited [2018]...
Read More
Employment Law / Litigation & Dispute Resolution / Construction

Does it Really Matter What You Call Your Employees? The Difference Between a Permanent and a Casual Employee.

The Federal Court found the casual employee worked a regular and continuous pattern of work for more than two years,...
Read More
Commercial Law / Construction / Employment Law

September 2018 Newsletter

September 2018 Newsletter See the full newsletter here Welcome TLFC Law are pleased to welcome Min Seetoh to the...
Read More
Commercial Law / Employment Law / Real Estate Agents

Are you complying with the Real Estate Industry Award? Don’t get caught out!

Changes to the Real Estate Industry Award 2010 Important changes to the Award include: Classification of employees and...
Read More
Not-for-Profit & Charities / Technology and Start Ups / Adverse Possession

TLFC – Award Finalist for Law Firm of the Year (Medium Category)

Tisher Liner FC are proud to be nominated as an award finalist in the 14th annual Victorian Legal Awards Medium Law...
Read More