By Sining Wang

31 July 2018

In litigation, subpoenas for production can be a very effective tool to obtain documents from third parties. However, if not properly drafted, the subpoenas can entirely backfire – and the costs consequences can be severe.

In a recent decision of the Supreme Court of Victoria, Brady Queen Pty Ltd and 280 Queen Street Pty Ltd & Anor (No 1) [2018] VSC 334, Justice Sifiris struck down a series of subpoenas on the basis that they were “a misuse of the jurisdiction” and “fundamentally misconceived”. Our clients (the subpoenaed parties) were awarded costs on an indemnity basis.

What caused those subpoenas to attract such scathing criticism from the Court?

Issue 1

The first problem was that the subpoenas were vague and far too wide. A subpoena for production must state precisely what documents must be produced. A subpoena for production should leave no uncertainty for the recipient as to how to comply, nor should it require the recipient to make “judgment calls” about what is included under the subpoena and what isn’t.

Issue 2

The second problem was that the documents sought under the subpoenas were not relevant to the issues in dispute. A subpoena for production must have a legitimate forensic purpose. This case concerned the valuation of a certain property development. The subpoenas sought the production of valuation-related documents relating to other property developments by the same developer. The Court did not view the documents sought as relevant.

Issue 3

The third problem was that the underlying purpose of the subpoenas were inappropriate altogether, thus constituting a “misuse of the jurisdiction”. The issuing party in this case had effectively sought to use the subpoenas to verify its own expert’s valuation assumptions – the legal equivalent of wanting to read someone else’s homework to check if yours is correct. As the Court noted: “Although valuation as such is a relevant issue, the manner of establishing it through expert evidence is solely a matter for the party calling the evidence. Calling on those related to the opposing party to assist because of other suggested similar projects is not open.”


The consequences of issuing a bad subpoena – like the ones in this case – are severe. Depending on the Court, an issuing party could potentially be ordered to pay a subpoenaed party tens of thousands of dollars in costs.

Our firm acted for two of the subpoenaed parties that successfully objected to and defended the subpoenas in the above mentioned case. Our firm has extensive experience in successfully issuing valid subpoenas and opposing invalid subpoenas.


If you require advice about subpoenas, please do not hesitate to contact our litigation team.

Related Articles

View All
Owners Corporation / Owners Corporations & Strata / Property & Development

Looking behind an Owners Corporation’s ‘special resolution’ to authorise legal proceedings

At an interlocutory hearing, the developer asked VCAT to dismiss the Owners Corporations’ proceedings on the basis...
Read More
Property & Development / Developments

Sale of Land Amendment Act: What You Need To Know

The Act implements key outcomes of the Consumer Property Law Review’s examination of the Sale of Land Act 1962 (Vic)...
Read More
Property & Development / Developments

The Sun Sets on Developer Rights

The new Sunset Provisions will give greater power to purchasers in off-the-plans contracts The amendments will...
Read More
Business Law / Property & Development / Developments

TLFC Law Triple Finalists in the Lawyers Weekly Australian Law Awards 2019

Celebrating its 19th year, the Australian Law Awards, in partnership with UNSW Law, is the pinnacle of award programs...
Read More
Construction / Property & Development / Construction

What Developers should look for in a Vendor Statement

The Vendor Statement in particular is often the starting point for a developer’s due diligence enquiries and it is...
Read More
Property & Development / Developments

Developers Beware: Stamp Duty Soon to be Payable on Development Agreements

Developers need to be aware of this Act as stamp duty will now, in most cases, be payable on what has been...
Read More
Commercial Contracts & Agreements / Leasing & Lease Disputes / Property & Development

Could you Be Contaminated?

Whether you are the purchaser of land, the seller, a landlord, a tenant, a developer or a lender, there are obligations...
Read More
Information Technology & Innovation / Developments / Business Law

Cyber Security and Protection from Cyber Fraud

Email communication is an inherent part of modern day business It is not uncommon to run an entire transaction online,...
Read More
Property & Development / Developments

Co-ownership of property, what could go wrong?

This can be a very exciting time and you can easily get caught up in the celebrations of settlement without a second...
Read More
Business Law / Property & Development / International Investors

Self Managed Superannuation Funds and Property Investment Part 2: Stamp Duty when Transferring Property Assets

Whether the SMSF has purchased this property outright or though the assistance of a Limited Recourse Borrowing...
Read More
Business Law / Property & Development / International Investors

Self-Managed Superannuation Funds and Property Investment Part 1: Using Borrowed Funds for Real Property Investment

There are potentially numerous benefits for purchasing property via a SMSF including asset protection and concessional...
Read More
Property & Development / Developments

PEXA electronic conveyancing in, paper-based settlements out from 1 October 2018.

As of 1 October 2018, paper-based settlements are no more and almost all property transactions in Victoria must be...
Read More