By Simon Abraham

7 March 2017

Subpoenas are useful weapons in litigation. Subpoenas allow litigants to access information held by third parties that would not normally be available.

Subpoenas can be profitable, but this often comes at a price. A party issuing a subpoena must usually pay the reasonable expenses incurred by the third party in complying with the subpoena.

A third party dragged into somebody else’s litigation under the threat of being in contempt of court if it doesn’t comply with the subpoena can be compensated for the costs and expenses of compliance.

Regrettably, many people served with subpoenas aren’t aware of this and spend a great deal of time, effort and money searching for, collating and copying documents, emails and other information without any reimbursement whatsoever.

In the well-known battle between the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority (ASADA) and the Essendon Football Club, one of the only people to come out unscathed was a chemist who was served with a subpoena by ASADA and the AFL.

In this case, Chief Executive of Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority Australian Football League v 34 Players and One Support Person (No 2) [2015] VSC 14, ASADA and the AFL contended that the chemist should recover costs assessed on the ordinary Court scale.

The Court disagreed and said that where a third party has been of considerable assistance to the court and was a non-party with no pecuniary interest in the outcome, they should recover costs on an indemnity basis.

This doesn’t just include legal costs relating to compliance with the subpoena. Other recoverable costs of complying with a subpoena can include costs associated with:

  • locating and collating subpoenaed material (1);
  • reviewing job files (2);
  • airfreighting (3);
  • reproducing subpoenaed material; for example, photocopying; and
  • corporate or professional time; for example, where a company charges an hourly rate for its employees’ services, it may be reimbursed at the charge-out rate for time spent by its employees searching for, collating or copying documents sought by a subpoena (4).

Note: Receiving a subpoena is not a license to charge anything that the recipient wants to charge. Expenses must be reasonable and what is reasonable is determined by the facts. The onus is on the person issuing the subpoena to prove that costs being claimed are not reasonable.

Our firm was recently able to recover all of our client’s reasonable costs and expenses, including the cost of employing a team of IT specialists who were necessary to provide the required subpoenaed material.
(1) J Aron Corp v Newmont Yandal Operations Pty Ltd[2004] NSWSC 996;
(2) Ibid.
(3) Deposit and Investment Co Ltd (Receivers Appointed) v Peat Marwick Mitchell and Co (unreported, Supreme Court New South Wales, Bainton J, 8 March 1996).
(4) Ibid.

 

For further information and advice surrounding subpoenas, please contact Samuel McMahon or a member of our Dispute Resolution Team.

Related Articles

View All
Litigation & Dispute Resolution / Property & Development / Developments

Rules of Thumb for Purchasing a Property

Good advice is only going to benefit you if you take advantage of it This applies whatever your purpose for the...
Read More
Technology and Start Ups / Litigation & Dispute Resolution / Privacy Laws & Trading Terms

High Court Finds Google’s Search Engine has the Capacity to Defame

For many years, Google has claimed that its search engine has no capacity to defame Effectively, Google has argued that...
Read More
Australia-Israel Legal Advice / Charities & Not-for-Profit / Technology and Start Ups

TLFC – Award Finalist for Law Firm of the Year (Medium Category)

Tisher Liner FC are proud to be nominated as an award finalist in the 14th annual Victorian Legal Awards Medium Law...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Public Examinations – Inquisition or Corporate Karma?

Regardless of this clause, A2Z alleged that McDonalds terminated the cleaning contract with only one day’s notice,...
Read More
Business Law / Commercial Contracts & Agreements / Intellectual Property

It Won’t Happen To Us! We Know Each Other – We Don’t Need an Agreement

The material considerations relevant to your interest, whether it be a property development, joint venture,...
Read More
Property & Development / Litigation & Dispute Resolution

A Timely Reminder of the Underquoting Laws

During that period Consumer Affairs Victoria (CAV), the Regulatory Body that governs real estate agents, has...
Read More
Leasing & Lease Disputes / Property & Development / Developments

Commercial Leases – Protect your Property

By the end of the lease (whether by expiry, abandonment or eviction) things may look different And you may need to...
Read More
Business Law / Commercial Contracts & Agreements / Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Corporate Divorce – The Importance of Prompt Damage Control

When good companies fail due to deteriorating business relationships, there is often a cast of familiar players: 1 The...
Read More
Construction / Litigation & Dispute Resolution / Property & Development

Domestic Building Dispute Resolution – New Regime

The days of VCAT being a first-instance negotiator in Victorian domestic building disputes are coming to an end...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Don’t be scared of a subpoena

A subpoena can be a daunting document Expressed as an order of a Court, a subpoena requires the person served to either...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution / Commercial Contracts & Agreements / Business Law

Handshake Agreements and the 100 million dollar bar coaster – Why it pays to speak to a litigator

In 2006 our firm successfully enforced an agreement between shareholders in an unlisted company based on nothing more...
Read More