By Simon Abraham

23 July 2019

All litigants like winning cases. An order for costs never hurts either. However, some litigants don’t properly consider the recoverability of cost orders prior to instituting proceedings.

When can a party not named as a litigant be responsible for the payment of costs (cost orders) in a legal proceeding?

The making of an order for costs against a non-party is an exceptional course for a court to take. The usual order, of course, is that the losing party pays the successful party’s costs of the proceeding. There are, however, recognised sets of circumstances in which express provisions authorise, or the interests of justice require, the making of a non-party order for costs.

Our firm recently dealt with this issue in the case of Royal Fresh International Pty Ltd v Nutracare Life Sciences Pty Ltd (in liq) as Trustee for the Nutracare Life Sciences Unit Trust [2019] VCC 553 (29 April 2019).

The power to make a non-party costs order can arise where:

  • a named party is insolvent;
  • the non-party played a sufficiently active role in the conduct of the litigation;
  • the non-party has a sufficient interest in the litigation;
  • the interests of justice require it.

In the Royal Fresh case, a company was shocked to discover that in Australia the law does not bestow personal liability for costs upon directors.

An unsuccessful attempt was made by a litigant to recover costs from the directors personally. The Court reaffirmed that a company has an independent legal personality distinct from that of its shareholders and neither shareholders nor directors, as a general proposition, are personally liable for a company’s acts and defaults.
In some exceptional cases, where the non-party is a real party to the litigation and is also actively involved and personally interested in the proceeding, the Court may have jurisdiction to consider making a cost order against the non-party.

Courts will not underwrite bad commercial decisions. A litigant that sues a company with no assets is often setting themselves up for a double disappointment.

 

If you have any litigation questions, please do not hesitate to contact Simon Abraham, Phoebe Langridge or a member of our firm’s litigation team.

 

Disclaimer
The material contained in this publication is meant to be informational only and is not to be construed as legal advice. Tisher Liner FC Law will not be held liable or responsible for any claim, which is made as a result of any person relying upon the information contained in this publication.

Related Articles

View All
Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Transact Now, Regret Later – The Case for Credit Management

This can cover a wide range of business situations Most commonly, you might be considering letting your premises to a...
Read More
Business Law / Property & Development / Developments

TLFC Law Triple Finalists in the Lawyers Weekly Australian Law Awards 2019

Celebrating its 19th year, the Australian Law Awards, in partnership with UNSW Law, is the pinnacle of award programs...
Read More
Commercial Contracts & Agreements / Litigation & Dispute Resolution / Charities & Not-For-Profits

Write it in now, or forever hold your peace

All these contracts have one thing in common: you are going to be at a disadvantage if you are relying on any...
Read More
Australia-Israel Legal Advice / Australia-Israel Opportunities / Litigation & Dispute Resolution

The Rabbi and the Recalcitrant: The Co-Existence of Secular and Religious Court post-Ulman v Live Group Pty Ltd

The Ulman case began with a commercial dispute between two observant Orthodox Jews to which the Respondent was a party...
Read More
Employment Law / Business Law / Litigation & Dispute Resolution

What employers need to know when letting someone go

A staff member may need to be let go because the business can no longer afford them, or perhaps they are just not...
Read More
Employment Law / Litigation & Dispute Resolution / Intellectual Property

Dude, Where’s my Business? High Court Delivers Warning to Employees and Competitors who engage in Dishonest Conduct to Get Ahead in the Game

The case of Ancient Foresters in Victoria Friendly Society Limited v Lifeplan Australia Friendly Society Limited [2018]...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution

The Road to Mediation: the benefits of alternative dispute resolution

For instance, many contracts and agreements include a ‘dispute resolution’ clause The dispute resolution clause...
Read More
Employment Law / Litigation & Dispute Resolution / Construction

Does it Really Matter What You Call Your Employees? The Difference Between a Permanent and a Casual Employee.

The Federal Court found the casual employee worked a regular and continuous pattern of work for more than two years,...
Read More
Property & Development / Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Subpoenas: think twice before pushing the button

In a recent decision of the Supreme Court of Victoria, Brady Queen Pty Ltd and 280 Queen Street Pty Ltd & Anor (No...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution / Property & Development / Developments

Rules of Thumb for Purchasing a Property

Good advice is only going to benefit you if you take advantage of it This applies whatever your purpose for the...
Read More
Technology and Start Ups / Litigation & Dispute Resolution / Privacy Laws & Trading Terms

High Court Finds Google’s Search Engine has the Capacity to Defame

For many years, Google has claimed that its search engine has no capacity to defame Effectively, Google has argued that...
Read More