By Jonathan Tisher

3 June 2015

On 10 May 2013 the Victorian Court of Appeal handed down a decision in the matter of Harofam Pty Ltd v Scherman [VSCA]104 that will directly impact on a developers ability to extend the date of registration of plans of subdivision.

The Respondent (Scherman) purchased property from an unregistered plan of subdivision (i.e. off-the-plan) from the Appellant developer (Harofam). The contract stipulated that both parties had the right to terminate the contract after 24 months, if the plan of subdivision was not registered. Harofam included a clause in the contract of sale which purported to allow it a further extension of not more than six months (but did not include a fixed date) to register the plan in circumstances where delays ensued that were beyond Harofam’s control.

The Court held that the plan of subdivision was required to be registered within a defined period of time which was contemplated at the time the contract of sale was entered into between the parties. Harofam’s argument was that the six month extension provided certainty to the purchaser that, at worst, the purchaser knew that the plan had to be registered within 30 months. The court rejected this argument on the basis that:

(a) Disputes could arise between the parties as to which delays were considered to be out of Harofam’s control; and

(b) Section 9AE of the Sale of Land Act 1962 (“the Act”) requires that a subdivision be registered within a specific period of time, which is known to the parties at the time of entering into the contract.

Currently, the Act specifically sets out an 18 month time frame by which developers must register a plan of subdivision. However, this may be extended by developers in the contract of sale, provided that the new date for registration is specifically stated in the contract. Purchasers have the right to terminate the contract of sale once this deadline has expired, provided the plan remains unregistered.

Developers attempting to market off-the-plan lots to potential purchasers should ensure that a contract of sale specifically outlines the final date by which the plan of subdivision may be registered. Developers should attempt to take into account all foreseeable issues which could cause delays from the outset and this should be reflected in the date of registration of the plan of subdivision.

Failing to take the above into account could give purchasers the right to terminate the contract, demand a refund of their deposits and ultimately affect a vendors pre-sales significantly (which could, in turn, affect the viability of a development project).


For more information regarding off the plan sales, please contact Jonathan Tisher in our Property Law department.

Related Articles

View All
Property & Development / Developments / Real Estate Agents

First Home Owners Guide: What You Need to Know

First Home Owners: there are many things for you to think about – what suburb you want to live in, what type of...
Read More
Property & Development / Real Estate Agents

URGENT LEGAL UPDATE – New Statements of Information just released

Tisher Liner FC Law were consulted by Consumer Affairs Victoria in respect to their review of Statements of...
Read More
Owners Corporation / Owners Corporations & Strata / Property & Development

Looking behind an Owners Corporation’s ‘special resolution’ to authorise legal proceedings

At an interlocutory hearing, the developer asked VCAT to dismiss the Owners Corporations’ proceedings on the basis...
Read More
Property & Development / Developments

Sale of Land Amendment Act: What You Need To Know

The Act implements key outcomes of the Consumer Property Law Review’s examination of the Sale of Land Act 1962 (Vic)...
Read More
Property & Development / Developments

The Sun Sets on Developer Rights

The new Sunset Provisions will give greater power to purchasers in off-the-plans contracts The amendments will...
Read More
Business Law / Property & Development / Developments

TLFC Law Triple Finalists in the Lawyers Weekly Australian Law Awards 2019

Celebrating its 19th year, the Australian Law Awards, in partnership with UNSW Law, is the pinnacle of award programs...
Read More
Construction / Property & Development / Construction

What Developers should look for in a Vendor Statement

The Vendor Statement in particular is often the starting point for a developer’s due diligence enquiries and it is...
Read More
Property & Development / Developments

Developers Beware: Stamp Duty Soon to be Payable on Development Agreements

Developers need to be aware of this Act as stamp duty will now, in most cases, be payable on what has been...
Read More
Commercial Contracts & Agreements / Leasing & Lease Disputes / Property & Development

Could you Be Contaminated?

Whether you are the purchaser of land, the seller, a landlord, a tenant, a developer or a lender, there are obligations...
Read More
Information Technology & Innovation / Developments / Business Law

Cyber Security and Protection from Cyber Fraud

Email communication is an inherent part of modern day business It is not uncommon to run an entire transaction online,...
Read More
Property & Development / Developments

Co-ownership of property, what could go wrong?

This can be a very exciting time and you can easily get caught up in the celebrations of settlement without a second...
Read More
Business Law / Property & Development / International Investors

Self Managed Superannuation Funds and Property Investment Part 2: Stamp Duty when Transferring Property Assets

Whether the SMSF has purchased this property outright or though the assistance of a Limited Recourse Borrowing...
Read More