By Jonathan Tisher

3 June 2015

On 10 May 2013 the Victorian Court of Appeal handed down a decision in the matter of Harofam Pty Ltd v Scherman [VSCA]104 that will directly impact on a developers ability to extend the date of registration of plans of subdivision.

The Respondent (Scherman) purchased property from an unregistered plan of subdivision (i.e. off-the-plan) from the Appellant developer (Harofam). The contract stipulated that both parties had the right to terminate the contract after 24 months, if the plan of subdivision was not registered. Harofam included a clause in the contract of sale which purported to allow it a further extension of not more than six months (but did not include a fixed date) to register the plan in circumstances where delays ensued that were beyond Harofam’s control.

The Court held that the plan of subdivision was required to be registered within a defined period of time which was contemplated at the time the contract of sale was entered into between the parties. Harofam’s argument was that the six month extension provided certainty to the purchaser that, at worst, the purchaser knew that the plan had to be registered within 30 months. The court rejected this argument on the basis that:

(a) Disputes could arise between the parties as to which delays were considered to be out of Harofam’s control; and

(b) Section 9AE of the Sale of Land Act 1962 (“the Act”) requires that a subdivision be registered within a specific period of time, which is known to the parties at the time of entering into the contract.

Currently, the Act specifically sets out an 18 month time frame by which developers must register a plan of subdivision. However, this may be extended by developers in the contract of sale, provided that the new date for registration is specifically stated in the contract. Purchasers have the right to terminate the contract of sale once this deadline has expired, provided the plan remains unregistered.

Developers attempting to market off-the-plan lots to potential purchasers should ensure that a contract of sale specifically outlines the final date by which the plan of subdivision may be registered. Developers should attempt to take into account all foreseeable issues which could cause delays from the outset and this should be reflected in the date of registration of the plan of subdivision.

Failing to take the above into account could give purchasers the right to terminate the contract, demand a refund of their deposits and ultimately affect a vendors pre-sales significantly (which could, in turn, affect the viability of a development project).


For more information regarding off the plan sales, please contact Jonathan Tisher in our Property Law department.

Related Articles

View All
Leasing & Lease Disputes / Property & Development / Real Estate Agents

COVID-19 Lease Update – The Regulations are in. It’s time to negotiate in good faith

The Covid-19 Omnibus (Emergence Measures) (Commercial Leases and Licences) Regulations 2020 (“the...
Read More
Leasing & Lease Disputes / Real Estate Agents / Property & Development

COVID-19 and Leases – The Legislation has arrived. What now?

On 24 April 2020 the COVID-19 Omnibus (Emergency Measures) Act 2020 (“the Act”) passed Victorian Parliament What is...
Read More
Leasing & Lease Disputes / Property & Development / Real Estate Agents

COVID-19 | Landlords and Tenants what do you do?

The Prime Minister has just announced a COVID-19 Mandatory Code for Commercial Tenancies But what is it and how is it...
Read More
Property & Development / Developments

GST easy as 1-2-3

Here are the top three questions we get asked by clients when it comes to GST and property   1 Is GST payable when...
Read More
Property & Development / Real Estate Agents / Leasing & Lease Disputes

The Retail Leases Amendment Bill 2019: What do the proposed changes mean for landlords and tenants of retail premises?

The Retail Leases Act 2003 (the “Act”) as presently drafted is intended to provide certainty and fairness in retail...
Read More
Property & Development / Developments / Real Estate Agents

First Home Owners Guide: What You Need to Know

First Home Owners: there are many things for you to think about – what suburb you want to live in, what type of...
Read More
Property & Development / Real Estate Agents

URGENT LEGAL UPDATE – New Statements of Information just released

Tisher Liner FC Law were consulted by Consumer Affairs Victoria in respect to their review of Statements of...
Read More
Owners Corporation / Owners Corporations & Strata / Property & Development

Looking behind an Owners Corporation’s ‘special resolution’ to authorise legal proceedings

At an interlocutory hearing, the developer asked VCAT to dismiss the Owners Corporations’ proceedings on the basis...
Read More
Property & Development / Developments

Sale of Land Amendment Act: What You Need To Know

The Act implements key outcomes of the Consumer Property Law Review’s examination of the Sale of Land Act 1962 (Vic)...
Read More
Property & Development / Developments

The Sun Sets on Developer Rights

The new Sunset Provisions will give greater power to purchasers in off-the-plans contracts The amendments will...
Read More
Commercial Law / Property & Development / Developments

TLFC Law Triple Finalists in the Lawyers Weekly Australian Law Awards 2019

Celebrating its 19th year, the Australian Law Awards, in partnership with UNSW Law, is the pinnacle of award programs...
Read More
Construction / Property & Development / Construction

What Developers should look for in a Vendor Statement

The Vendor Statement in particular is often the starting point for a developer’s due diligence enquiries and it is...
Read More