Repercussions for breaching Model Rules and VCAT Orders.
The Owners Corporation Act 2006 (VIC) ("OC Act") outlines that the Rules of an Owners Corporation that are binding on thThe Owners Corporation Act 2006 (VIC) ("OC Act") outlines that the Rules of an Owners Corporation that are binding on the Owners Corporation, lot owners, lessee or sub-lessee of a lot and occupiers of lots. The Owners Corporation Regulations 2007 ("OC Regulations") prescribe the Model Rules that apply to Owners Corporations who have not made their own registered Rules. Owners Corporation, lot owners, lessee or sub-lessee of a lot and occupiers of lots. The Owners Corporation Regulations 2007 ("OC Regulations") prescribe the Model Rules that apply to Owners Corporations who have not made their own registered Rules.
In the recent Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal case of Kanter v Milroy Investments Australia Pty Ltd [2015] VCAT 90, there were serious repercussions for lot owners who negligently or deliberately breached the Model Rules and VCAT Orders. Kanter (“the Applicant”) and Milroy Investments Australia Pty Ltd (“the Respondent”) were members of an Owners Corporation for a commercial property made up of factories.
The Applicant conducted business within his lot in manufacturing stationary. The Respondent conducted business within his lot producing certain materials for motor vehicles. The factories of each party are side by side where they share a driveway that is common property.
The Applicant alleged that the Directors of the Respondent continuously contravened the Model Rules by allowing motor vehicles of all descriptions to regularly park on the Common Property, preventing the Applicant’s customers from entering the premises safely, or at all. The Tribunal’s findings indicated that the Respondent had breached the Model Rules and previous VCAT orders by obstructing the lawful use of the Common Property entitled to be used by other lot owners and their customers, and that the Respondent had obstructed the driveway and pathway to a lot by parking a vehicle on Common Property. A significant amount of evidence about the Respondent’s behaviour was given.
VCAT ordered that the Respondent guilty of contempt of the VCAT and ordered the Respondent to pay a $10,000.00 fine. The Respondent was also ordered to pay the Applicant the amount of $2,996.30 for reimbursement of filing fees. This case shows that breaching the Model Rules can have significant financial repercussions for lot owners and makes enforcing rules an attractive option for Owners Corporations regulating Common Property.
Any further questions, please contact a member of our Owners Corporation team.
Related Articles
View AllOccupancy permits – the ticking clock in defective building work
By Antoinette Daley
7 August 2023
Telecommunication Leases and Owners Corporations
By Phillip Leaman
8 November 2022
Courtyards and car spaces – Do you have the legal right to use them?
By Phillip Leaman
26 October 2022
Owners Corporations- Do you have adequate rules?
By Phillip Leaman
25 October 2022
Know your plan of subdivision- Owners corporations who owns what?
By Phillip Leaman
30 September 2022
Brief summary of the new Owners Corporations ACT
By Phillip Leaman
11 March 2022
Defective domestic building works but no written major domestic building contract – Do you still have an obligation to pay the builder?
By Phillip Leaman
25 June 2021
Easements and Owners Corporations
By Phillip Leaman
4 June 2021
Adverse possession and Owners Corporations
By Phillip Leaman
1 June 2021
Common Property and repairs by lot owners
By Phillip Leaman
26 May 2021
Insurance
By Phillip Leaman
19 May 2021
Voting and Quorums
By Phillip Leaman
11 May 2021