By Bianca Mazzarella

15 June 2021

The #MeToo movement has the Australian government paying attention and not just to box office movies like ‘Bombshell’ and ‘the Assistant’.

On 8 April 2021 the government publicly endorsed recommendations of the Respect@Work Report, commissioned by the Sex Discrimination Commissioner.


What are some of the recommendations?


In addition to support being expressed for extending the scope of the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (‘Sex Discrimination Act’) to judges and members of parliament, the recommendations also include:


  • clarifying the provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (‘FW Act’) to enable Stop Bullying Orders (SBOs) to expressly include sexual harassment orders;
  • amending section 387 of the FW Act to state that sexual harassment can be conduct amounting to a valid reason for dismissal;
  • amending the definition of ‘serious misconduct’ in the Fair Work Regulations to include sexual harassment;
  • amending the model Work Health Safety Regulations to deal with psychological health, and develop guidelines on sexual harassment with a view to informing the development of a Code of Practice on sexual harassment;
  • amending the Sex Discrimination Act to introduce a positive duty on all employers to take reasonable and proportionate measures to eliminate sex discrimination, sexual harassment, and victimisation, as far as possible in the workplace (subject to further assessment by the government); and
  • requiring collection of data at workplace and industry level, to help improve understanding of the scope and nature of the problem posed by sexual harassment.


Impact on employers?


Employers need to make sure they have adequate sexual harassment policies and make sure they treat sexual harassment seriously and take active steps to prevent it to avoid becoming vicariously liable for such conduct.


Courts are already taking a hard line approach to this issue as illustrated in Von Schoeler v Allen Taylor and Company Ltd Trading as Boral Timber (No 2) [2020], whereby the Full Bench of the Federal Court found that Boral was vicariously liable for an employee’s conduct as it failed to take all reasonable steps to prevent sexual harassment in the workplace. This included inadequate training of staff and failure to notify staff that disciplinary action may be taken against employees who engage in such conduct.


This case also set out that at a minimum employers must ensure that workplace policies and training sessions include clear, specific statements and evidence that employees understand the content of the policies and training.


What now?


Legislation is expected to be drafted by the federal government by the end of June 2021 but it would be reasonable to assume that employers will now be required to review the following:


  • workplace sexual harassment policies;
  • grievance policies in relation to how to support employees who make complaints;
  • training available and material in relation to sexual harassment; and
  • how incidences are recorded and used in the future to prevent such conduct.


Please do not hesitate to contact our employment team (Simon Abraham, Amy La Verde, Bianca Mazzarella or Madeline Hearn) if your business needs further guidance or support in relation to sexual harassment policies and training.

Related Articles

View All
Employment Law

Psychiatric injury due to prolonged workplace trauma – a warning for employers from the High Court!

The much anticipated High Court decision of Kozarov v State of Victoria [2020] VSC 78 (Kozarov) has provided much...
Read More
Employment Law / Small to Medium Enterprises

Boosting workplace vaccinations – who needs a third dose?

What are the new vaccine mandates Beginning 12 January 2022, workers over 18 years of age in essential fields, unless...
Read More
Employment Law

‘R E S P E C T’- Part 2 – find out what it means…..for women

As foreshadowed in our previous article, the Federal Government has succumbed to public pressure and taken much needed...
Read More
Employment Law

Superannuation Increase – Who wears the cost?

From 1 July 2021, a superannuation (super) increase from 95% to 10% of employee’s ordinary time earnings will occur...
Read More
Employment Law / Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Deliveroo decision creates chaos in the ‘Gig Economy’ as law struggles to keep up

Up until recently, businesses have relied upon ‘gig’ workers being able to be classified as independent contractors...
Read More
Employment Law

Snap lock down without JobKeeper, what happens now?

Businesses are no longer able to rely upon JobKeeper to keep their businesses and staff afloat and are left wondering...
Read More
Employment Law

Does anyone other than HR know about your workplace policies?

  What are policies and why does my business need them A workplace policy outlines a company or organisation’s...
Read More
Employment Law

When can I direct an employee to get the COVID-19 jab and what can I do if they refuse?

FWO further guidance The FWO has now provided further guidance in relation to when it is lawful and reasonable for an...
Read More
Employment Law

Can an employer force an employee to get the COVID-19 jab?

This question is topical given recent discussions around the roll out of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine in Australia and...
Read More
Employment Law / Small to Medium Enterprises

Full Federal Court allows double dipping for casual employees

Justice Bromberg and the Full Federal Court of Australia have once again delivered bad news for employers  In certain...
Read More
Employment Law / Small to Medium Enterprises / Start-ups & Emerging Enterprises

Fair Work Commission amends 99 Awards during COVID-19 Pandemic

On Wednesday, 8 April 2020, as a result of the COVID-19 Pandemic, a six (6) member Fair Work Commission full bench,...
Read More