By Phoebe Langridge

14 March 2018

Last week’s news featured a story of a ‘David and Goliath’ battle in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. In short, the story concerned A2Z, a cleaning company who had only one client, McDonalds. A2Z’s contract with McDonalds had a two-year notice period in the event of termination.

Regardless of this clause, A2Z alleged that McDonalds terminated the cleaning contract with only one day’s notice, resulting in A2Z instituting proceedings against McDonalds for breach of contract. Before the proceeding could be determined A2Z went into liquidation. The decision to continue the proceeding then fell to the Liquidator, who, in order to assess the merit of continuing the proceeding, commenced a public examination.

What is the purpose of public examinations?

Public examinations are a useful tool, especially for liquidators, to investigate what claims may exist and their potential merit. As opposed to litigation, public examinations are inquisitorial in nature and allow a liquidator (or other ‘eligible applicants’ as defined in section 9 of the Corporations Act Cth (2001)) to investigate the ‘examinable affairs’ of a company by examining certain people who can provide information on the ‘examinable affairs’ of the company.

Who can be examined?

The Corporations Act (Cth) 2001 (the Act) provides for two different types of examinations, mandatory examinations and discretionary examinations. Mandatory examinations (under section 596A of the Act) are issued to ‘officers’ of the company, for example a director of the company. Provided the criteria of section 596A of the Act is met, the Court has no discretion and is required to issue the summons for examination.

In contrast, discretionary examinations (under section 596B of the Act) are broader, more far reaching and extend beyond ‘officers’ of the company. A discretionary examination can be issued to anyone who may be able to give information about the company’s ‘examinable affairs’. Unlike mandatory examinations, the Court has discretion and will need to be satisfied that the person:
(i) has taken part or been concerned in examinable affairs of the corporation and has been, or may have been, guilty of misconduct in relation to the corporation; or
(ii) may be able to give information about examinable affairs of the corporation.

Discretionary examinations may be issued to the company’s accountant, employees, solicitors, bookkeepers, business partners, creditors, or in the case of A2Z, various McDonalds’ employees who dealt with A2Z.

In A2Z’s case, the liquidator will now need to consider the information it gathered from the pubic examination to determine if there is merit in continuing the substantive proceeding commenced by A2Z against McDonalds prior to going into liquidation.

 

If you require insolvency advice or representation in relation to the public examination process, please do not hesitate to contact a member of our Litigation team.

Related Articles

View All
Commercial Law / Commercial Contracts & Agreements / Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Recording | TLFC Law Lunchtime Briefing | Commercial Matrimony – Marry/Battle/Kill

The slides are also available Please click here to view the PowerPoint Slides   Facilitated by Ron Cohen...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Your property has been restrained! What do you do when the government freezes your assets?

What if you own property that is suspected to have been used in connection with a crime What if an employee,  family...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Corporate life after death – Reinstating a company and how to do it

A company may be deregistered for various reasons It may be voluntary by the members (shareholders) of a company, it...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution

It’s the Contract!!! High Court states employment relationships are based on contract, not friendship.

Whilst the High Court reached two different outcomes in the matters of CFMEU & Anor v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution / Property & Development

Interstate Landlords in Victoria – new arrangements in the Magistrates’ Court of Victoria

One of the hassles for residential landlords who own property in Victoria but live interstate has been the lack of...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Freeze, don’t move!…How to freeze assets

You are a creditor, owed a significant sum of money, and you have reason to believe that the defendant is likely to:...
Read More
Employment Law / Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Deliveroo decision creates chaos in the ‘Gig Economy’ as law struggles to keep up

Up until recently, businesses have relied upon ‘gig’ workers being able to be classified as independent contractors...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Winning Civil Cases as a Defendant – TLFC on a winning roll…

In Australia, in our civil system, Plaintiffs need to prove their case on the balance of probabilities   The...
Read More
Commercial Law / Commercial Contracts & Agreements / Corporate Advisory and M&A

Announcing our Promotions

Rob joined us in 2017 and immediately impressed us with his litigation skills and incredible work ethic It’s no...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Transact Now, Regret Later – The Case for Credit Management

This can cover a wide range of business situations Most commonly, you might be considering letting your premises to a...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Playing the man and not the ball: When non-party cost orders are available in Court

When can a party not named as a litigant be responsible for the payment of costs (cost orders) in a legal proceeding...
Read More
Commercial Law / Property & Development / Developments

TLFC Law Triple Finalists in the Lawyers Weekly Australian Law Awards 2019

Celebrating its 19th year, the Australian Law Awards, in partnership with UNSW Law, is the pinnacle of award programs...
Read More