By Simon Abraham

23 July 2019

All litigants like winning cases. An order for costs never hurts either. However, some litigants don’t properly consider the recoverability of cost orders prior to instituting proceedings.

When can a party not named as a litigant be responsible for the payment of costs (cost orders) in a legal proceeding?

The making of an order for costs against a non-party is an exceptional course for a court to take. The usual order, of course, is that the losing party pays the successful party’s costs of the proceeding. There are, however, recognised sets of circumstances in which express provisions authorise, or the interests of justice require, the making of a non-party order for costs.

Our firm recently dealt with this issue in the case of Royal Fresh International Pty Ltd v Nutracare Life Sciences Pty Ltd (in liq) as Trustee for the Nutracare Life Sciences Unit Trust [2019] VCC 553 (29 April 2019).

The power to make a non-party costs order can arise where:

  • a named party is insolvent;
  • the non-party played a sufficiently active role in the conduct of the litigation;
  • the non-party has a sufficient interest in the litigation;
  • the interests of justice require it.

In the Royal Fresh case, a company was shocked to discover that in Australia the law does not bestow personal liability for costs upon directors.

An unsuccessful attempt was made by a litigant to recover costs from the directors personally. The Court reaffirmed that a company has an independent legal personality distinct from that of its shareholders and neither shareholders nor directors, as a general proposition, are personally liable for a company’s acts and defaults.
In some exceptional cases, where the non-party is a real party to the litigation and is also actively involved and personally interested in the proceeding, the Court may have jurisdiction to consider making a cost order against the non-party.

Courts will not underwrite bad commercial decisions. A litigant that sues a company with no assets is often setting themselves up for a double disappointment.


If you have any litigation questions, please do not hesitate to contact Simon Abraham, Phoebe Langridge or a member of our firm’s litigation team.


The material contained in this publication is meant to be informational only and is not to be construed as legal advice. Tisher Liner FC Law will not be held liable or responsible for any claim, which is made as a result of any person relying upon the information contained in this publication.

Related Articles

View All
Commercial Contracts & Agreements / Employment Law / Litigation & Dispute Resolution

New Limitations On Fixed Term Employment Contracts – Employers need to know what they don’t know!

As of today (6 December 2023), there will be new rules that impact the use of fixed term employment contracts These are...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution / Wills, Estates & Probate / Health & Aged Care

Do I need Probate? What is it?

When someone passes away, Probate is obtained by the executor of the deceased’s Will (or administrator if someone...
Read More
Leasing & Lease Disputes / Litigation & Dispute Resolution

We Won a Billboard!

Tisher Liner FC Law has won a brilliant new billboard, owing to achieving recent success for our client in the County...
Read More
Employment Law / Litigation & Dispute Resolution / Commercial Contracts & Agreements

Real Estate Agent Commission Victory shakes up Fair Entitlements Guarantee (FEG) Scheme

Tisher Liner FC Law has been acting on behalf of one such ‘eligible employee’ over the past three (3) years Our...
Read More
Commercial Law / Employment Law / Litigation & Dispute Resolution

International Women’s Day 2023: Embrace Equity

Have you ever wondered why the hallmark colours of International Women’s Day are vibrant purple, bold green and stark...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution

When the trust is gone – Shareholder relief under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)

Sometimes it happens that business relationships breakdown When the trust between the owners of a company is gone, some...
Read More
Commercial Law / Litigation & Dispute Resolution / Real Estate Agents

Pitfalls of exercising options

If the lease is subject to the Retail Leases Act 2003 (Victoria), then there are only two conditions that can be...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Strategy is vital

 Strategies come in all different forms and often a case will require short-term and long-term strategy  Strategies...
Read More
Commercial Law / Commercial Contracts & Agreements / Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Recording | TLFC Law Lunchtime Briefing | Commercial Matrimony – Marry/Battle/Kill

The slides are also available Please click here to view the PowerPoint Slides   Facilitated by Ron Cohen...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Your property has been restrained! What do you do when the government freezes your assets?

What if you own property that is suspected to have been used in connection with a crime What if an employee,  family...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Corporate life after death – Reinstating a company and how to do it

A company may be deregistered for various reasons It may be voluntary by the members (shareholders) of a company, it...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution

It’s the Contract!!! High Court states employment relationships are based on contract, not friendship.

Whilst the High Court reached two different outcomes in the matters of CFMEU & Anor v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd...
Read More