By Simon Abraham

1 April 2014

When does an approach to ‘poach’ a person contracted elsewhere cross the line between making a lawful offer to a potential employee or contractor compared to an unlawful interference with contractual relations?

The question strikes at the heart of our economic and legal system both of which are based upon principles of freedom of contract and freedom of choice. However, parties that freely enter contracts cannot freely breach such contracts and Courts have shown that they are prepared in some cases to provide relief against unlawful interferences with contractual relations.

Our firm recently made use of the tort of interference with contractual relations when protecting a medical centre whose doctors were approached by a rival chain of medical centres as part of an intensive attempt to induce doctors contracted to our client’s medical centre to breach their contracts and commence working for the competitor.

The tort, known as interference with contractual relations, occurs where a third party intentionally procures or induces a party contract to breach it. The wronged party to the contract can bring a claim for damages against the third party who procured the breach.

These tensions came to light in Australia in 1996 when Australia’s domestic rugby league competition split following News Limited’s decision to set up a new rugby league franchise known as Superleague. News Limited induced rugby players with significant financial sums to walk away from contracts at existing clubs and play in the new competition. The law would usually have dealt with this situation through actions for breach of contract on the part of each of the clubs against each of the players. Instead, the Federal Court initially held that News Limited had unlawfully interfered with the contractual relations that the clubs had with their players and imposed an injunction restraining the new competition from operating.

If a third party ’wrongdoer’ is to be restrained from making approaches to others, here is what will need to be shown by the aggrieved party to rely upon the tort of interference with contractual relations:

  • Knowledge on the part of the wrongdoer of a contract or the likely existence of a contract; and
  • An intention by the wrongdoer to interfere with the contract; and
  • Actual interference with the performance of the contract causing quantifiable damage to the aggrieved party

Recent case law has made it clear that the wrongdoer does not need to know the precise details of the contract but merely to be aware of there being at least a substantial prospect of a breach – with a decision being made by the wrongdoer to proceed in any event.


If you require advice or representation in relation to employment issues, please do not hesitate to contact Simon Abraham or a member of our Commercial team.

Related Articles

View All
Commercial Contracts & Agreements / Employment Law / Litigation & Dispute Resolution

New Limitations On Fixed Term Employment Contracts – Employers need to know what they don’t know!

As of today (6 December 2023), there will be new rules that impact the use of fixed term employment contracts These are...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution / Wills, Estates & Probate / Health & Aged Care

Do I need Probate? What is it?

When someone passes away, Probate is obtained by the executor of the deceased’s Will (or administrator if someone...
Read More
Leasing & Lease Disputes / Litigation & Dispute Resolution

We Won a Billboard!

Tisher Liner FC Law has won a brilliant new billboard, owing to achieving recent success for our client in the County...
Read More
Employment Law / Litigation & Dispute Resolution / Commercial Contracts & Agreements

Real Estate Agent Commission Victory shakes up Fair Entitlements Guarantee (FEG) Scheme

Tisher Liner FC Law has been acting on behalf of one such ‘eligible employee’ over the past three (3) years Our...
Read More
Commercial Law / Employment Law / Litigation & Dispute Resolution

International Women’s Day 2023: Embrace Equity

Have you ever wondered why the hallmark colours of International Women’s Day are vibrant purple, bold green and stark...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution

When the trust is gone – Shareholder relief under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)

Sometimes it happens that business relationships breakdown When the trust between the owners of a company is gone, some...
Read More
Commercial Law / Litigation & Dispute Resolution / Real Estate Agents

Pitfalls of exercising options

If the lease is subject to the Retail Leases Act 2003 (Victoria), then there are only two conditions that can be...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Strategy is vital

 Strategies come in all different forms and often a case will require short-term and long-term strategy  Strategies...
Read More
Commercial Law / Commercial Contracts & Agreements / Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Recording | TLFC Law Lunchtime Briefing | Commercial Matrimony – Marry/Battle/Kill

The slides are also available Please click here to view the PowerPoint Slides   Facilitated by Ron Cohen...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Your property has been restrained! What do you do when the government freezes your assets?

What if you own property that is suspected to have been used in connection with a crime What if an employee,  family...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Corporate life after death – Reinstating a company and how to do it

A company may be deregistered for various reasons It may be voluntary by the members (shareholders) of a company, it...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution

It’s the Contract!!! High Court states employment relationships are based on contract, not friendship.

Whilst the High Court reached two different outcomes in the matters of CFMEU & Anor v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd...
Read More