Owners Corporation

Owners Corporation legal matters are unique.

Engaging a lawyer that only practices Owners Corporation law can make all the difference.

Tisher Liner FC Law advises Owners Corporation for residential and commercial buildings across Victoria, and has successfully represented Owners Corporations in complex VCAT owners corporation disputes, including the following reported VCAT decisions:

Raso v Owners Corporation PS 638800J (Owners Corporations) [2020] VCAT 211 (16 March 2020)

We successfully defended an Owners Corporation for a large 11-storey residential apartment complex with over 100 lots against a penthouse lot owner’s claim that the Owners Corporation had been ‘unreasonable’ by not approving the lot owner’s renovation works.

Lambert v Owners Corporation No. RP2038 (Owners Corporation) [2019] VCAT 1580 (11 October 2019)

We successfully defended an Owners Corporation based on a narrow point of statutory interpretation about the timing of when Committee Members are considered ‘financial’ when they pay before a Committee meeting by BPAY.

Gidley v Owners Corporation 1 Plan No PS526394S (Owners Corporations) [2019] VCAT 827 (4 June 2019)

We successfully obtained a costs order for our lot owner clients against the applicant lot owners who had brought an owners corporation dispute about the legal validity of common property licences.

Owners Corporation Plan No. PS336460Q v Hallmark Group (Aust) Pty Ltd (Owners Corporations) [2018] VCAT 1483 (26 September 2018)

We successfully represented an Owners Corporation in a dispute with a corporate lot owner over its liability to pay a costs order for fee recovery proceedings. The corporate lot owner was ordered to pay the Owners Corporation’s fee recovery legal costs and reimburse the VCAT filing fees paid by the owners corporation.

Owners Corporation 1 PS611240X v Brady (Owners Corporation) [2018] VCAT 645 (26 April 2018)

We were involved in instructing Counsel to successfully defend a penthouse lot owner against a claim by an Owners Corporation for the lot owner to reinstate a door that was installed in a common property wall structure.

Langevad v Owners Corporation Plan No. 324783 & Anor (Owners Corporations) [2018] VCAT 784 (22 May 2018)

We successfully defended an Owners Corporation against allegations by a lot owner that the Owners Corporation had breached its duty under section 46 of the Owners Corporations Act 2006 to repair and maintain common property.

Owners Corporation No. 1 PS438893N v Kakos (Owners Corporations) [2017] VCAT 762 (30 May 2017)

We successfully acted for a large Docklands Owners Corporation to obtain an order that a lot owner who had installed a shade sail and clothesline into a common property building structure, must remove the unauthorised additions on the basis that the lot owner had breached the Owners Corporation’s registered rules.

Owners Corporation 1 Plan PS438893N v Kakos (Costs) (Owners Corporations) [2017] VCAT 1543 (26 September 2017)

We represented the same Owners Corporation to successfully obtain an order that the respondent lot owner must pay the Owners Corporation’s legal costs.

Stokes v Alexander & Owners Corporation 1 Plan No. PS328461J (Owners Corporations) [2017] VCAT 514 (21 April 2017)

We successfully defended an Owners Corporation for a rural lifestyle subdivision against a claim by a group of lot owners that the Owners Corporation’s decision to obtain a lease over part of a private lot, was legally invalid.

Jalowicki v Owners Corporation Plan No SP35671B (Owners Corporations) [2017] VCAT 50 (16 January 2017)

We successfully defended a lot owner who controlled 57% of the voting entitlements of the Owners Corporation, against a claim by a group of lot owners, that he had used his voting power to cause the Owners Corporation to raise a special levy using the benefit principle, improperly.

Rogers v Owners Corporation Plan No. PS16559 & Ors (Owners Corporations) [2017] VCAT 48 (13 January 2017)

We successfully defended an Owners Corporation for a residential townhouse scheme against various allegations by a lot owner that the Owners Corporation had failed to comply with its duty to allow him to inspect the Owners Corporation’s records.

Mission Express Pty Ltd v Hewcon Pty Ltd & Owners Corporation 1 Plan No. 703939 & Ors (Building and Property) [2016] VCAT 919 (8 June 2016)

We acted for an Owners Corporation for a Moonee Ponds mixed retail & commercial development to resist an application by the developer for an authorising order under section 165(1)(ba) of the Owners Corporations Act 2006 to ‘step into the shoes’ of the Owners Corporation to prosecute a claim against a builder.

Basic v Owners Corporation SP22934S (Owners Corporations) [2016] VCAT 856 (27 May 2016)

We successfully defended an Owners Corporation for a Brighton townhouse development against a lot owner’s claim that the Owners Corporation had breached terms of settlement that had been entered into in previous VCAT proceedings.

Sukeda v Owners Corporation 2 Plan No 529462 (Owners Corporations) [2016] VCAT 533 (6 April 2016)

We represented an Owners Corporation for a multiple-owners corporation plan of subdivision in a claim by a lot owner that there had been a misallocation of expenses as between the different Owners Corporations.

Click here to read our Frequently Asked Questions on Owners Corporations.

Click here to download our flyer: Short Stay Accommodation Explained.

Principal Nicole Wilde has recently submitted her suggestions and observations in relation to the Owners Corporations and Other Acts Amendment Bill 2019 (Vic) Exposure Draft (“the Draft Bill”).

Click here to view this submission.