By Felicity Simpson

7 June 2017

Contracts of employment often include bonus arrangements and redundancy entitlements linked to company policies.

These policies (or contacts of employment themselves) may incorporate a statement to the effect that these are ex gratia payments made in the “sole” or “absolute” discretion of the employer. Does the employer’s “absolute discretion” enable an employer to reduce or not pay the discretionary payment at any time as they see fit?

Employers need to appreciate that the courts have shown a willingness to imply terms into the contract of employment. It has always been the case that employment contracts are subject to the ordinary rules of interpretation. Discretionary employee payments are no exception.

The 2015 Federal Circuit decision in Russo v Westpac Banking Corporation (Russo) confirmed that an earlier 2010 NSW Supreme Court decision in Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd v Lindley (Silverbrook) was binding. Even though the facts in these decisions were different, the Court was clear in its position – the employer’s discretion was not unfettered. The Court stated that an employer’s discretion in respect of ex gratia payments “should not be construed so as to permit the appellant to withhold the bonus capriciously or arbitrarily or unreasonably”.

The Court in Silverbrook noted that “There may be many circumstances in which it would be legitimate, and conformable with the purposes of the contract, not to pay the bonus.” Essentially, each circumstance will need to be considered individually, in the context of the agreed contract of employment.

The practical implication for employers is that their discretion may not be unfettered. In those circumstances, all discretionary payments must be given due consideration in accordance with the employer’s own policies. Failure to do so, may place an employer at risk of a claim for breach of contract, in line with the above cases.

Employer’s wishing to have absolute unfettered discretion regarding “discretionary payments”, must ensure that the contract of employment is very clearly, precisely states its intentions and seeks to incorporate the criteria set out in Silverbrook. Also, employer’s should carefully consider and review any policies or guidelines used in determining the entitlement to and amount of any discretionary payment.

Further, careful consideration should be given to the inclusion of company policies (in whole or in part) into contracts of employment. Every business has its own specific requirements to be taken into consideration.


If you are an employer who pays discretionary bonuses or redundancy payments (or an employee wanting to claim an entitlement to a discretionary payment), please contact Felicity Simpson or a member of the Commercial Law Team.

Related Articles

View All
Employment Law

‘R E S P E C T’- find out what it means…..for employers

On 8 April 2021 the government publicly endorsed recommendations of the Respect@Work Report, commissioned by the Sex...
Read More
Employment Law / Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Deliveroo decision creates chaos in the ‘Gig Economy’ as law struggles to keep up

Up until recently, businesses have relied upon ‘gig’ workers being able to be classified as independent contractors...
Read More
Employment Law

Snap lock down without JobKeeper, what happens now?

Businesses are no longer able to rely upon JobKeeper to keep their businesses and staff afloat and are left wondering...
Read More
Employment Law

Does anyone other than HR know about your workplace policies?

  What are policies and why does my business need them A workplace policy outlines a company or organisation’s...
Read More
Employment Law

When can I direct an employee to get the COVID-19 jab and what can I do if they refuse?

FWO further guidance The FWO has now provided further guidance in relation to when it is lawful and reasonable for an...
Read More
Employment Law

Can an employer force an employee to get the COVID-19 jab?

This question is topical given recent discussions around the roll out of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine in Australia and...
Read More
Employment Law / Small to Medium Enterprises

Full Federal Court allows double dipping for casual employees

Justice Bromberg and the Full Federal Court of Australia have once again delivered bad news for employers  In certain...
Read More
Employment Law / Small to Medium Enterprises / Start-ups & Emerging Enterprises

Fair Work Commission amends 99 Awards during COVID-19 Pandemic

On Wednesday, 8 April 2020, as a result of the COVID-19 Pandemic, a six (6) member Fair Work Commission full bench,...
Read More
Employment Law

New industrial manslaughter laws are no laughing matter for employers

What are the laws The new laws will be applicable to all employers, self-employed individuals and officers of a company...
Read More
Employment Law / Commercial Law / Litigation & Dispute Resolution

What employers need to know when letting someone go

A staff member may need to be let go because the business can no longer afford them, or perhaps they are just not...
Read More
Employment Law / Litigation & Dispute Resolution / Intellectual Property

Dude, Where’s my Business? High Court Delivers Warning to Employees and Competitors who engage in Dishonest Conduct to Get Ahead in the Game

The case of Ancient Foresters in Victoria Friendly Society Limited v Lifeplan Australia Friendly Society Limited [2018]...
Read More
Employment Law / Litigation & Dispute Resolution / Construction

Does it Really Matter What You Call Your Employees? The Difference Between a Permanent and a Casual Employee.

The Federal Court found the casual employee worked a regular and continuous pattern of work for more than two years,...
Read More