New Guidance from VCAT on how Owners Corporations choose the appropriate method for raising Special Levies.

An important recent VCAT decision provides Victorian Owners Corporations, Committees, and Managers about how to choose the appropriate method of raising a Special Levy. The power to raise a Special Levy under section 24 of the Owners Corporations Act 2006 is a powerful one. Special levies of up to twice the amount of an Owners Corporation’s current annual fees can be raised by ordinary resolution. Special levies higher than that can be raised by special resolution. The two available methods of raising a special levy under section 24 of the Owners Corporations Act 2006 are:

  1. On the basis of lot liability; or
  2. On the basis that the lot owner of the lot that benefits more pays more (“the Benefit Principle”).

Due to the broad industry relevance of the detailed reasons in the Grundl decision and for the convenience of our subscribers, we repeat in full paragraph [16] of the reasons of the VCAT Senior Member in the Grundl decision (“the Grundl Assessment”) below:

“…[16] In my view, in the light of the Mashane decision on appeal and of s.24 as it now is, the law requires an owners corporation to act as follows when it sets special fees to cover extraordinary items of expenditure relating to repairs, maintenance or other works.

  • It must first turn its collective mind to the question of whether all lots benefit substantially from the works or whether some lots substantially benefit more than others.
  • If, acting in good faith and exercising due care and diligence, as s.5 of the Act obliges it to do, it decides that all lots substantially benefit, it must set fees in accordance with lot liability. There will be no legal error in the decision, and the Tribunal will not interfere with it on the application of an aggrieved lot owner, unless the decision was one which no members of an owners corporation, acting honestly and reasonably, could have made.
  • Failure to turn the collective mind to the question is a legal error. The error is unlikely to lead the Tribunal to interfere, on the application of an aggrieved lot owner, with a decision to set fees in accordance with lot liability if in reality all the lots benefit substantially from the works. Otherwise the legal error exposes the owners corporation to the risk that the Tribunal will declare the resolution invalid.
  • If the owners corporation decides that the works are substantially for the benefit of some, but not all, of the lots, it must set fees not in accordance with lot liability but in accordance with the benefit principle, so that the owner of the lot that benefits more pays more.
  • The owners corporation must decide the extent to which the various lots benefit and apportion the fees accordingly. In making the decision it must act in good faith and with due care and diligence. If it does, there will be no legal error in the decision, and the Tribunal will not interfere with it on the application of an aggrieved lot owner, unless the decision was outside the range of reasonableness so that it was one which no members of an owners corporation, acting honestly and reasonably, could have made, or unless there has been some other legal error.
  • However, if the lot owners cannot decide which principle to adopt or cannot decide upon the proper apportionment, and ask the Tribunal to decide, the Tribunal may do so.
  • Except in a case of urgency, there must be a special resolution for levying the amount of the extraordinary expenditure if it is more than twice the amount of the current annual fees.”

(“the Grundl Assessment”)

It remains to be seen on a case by case basis how Owners Corporations and their Committees will apply the Grundl Assessment when raising Special Levies and what will be considered ‘within’ and ‘outside of’ the “range of reasonableness”.

VCAT Case Reference: Owners Corporation PS407621Y v Grundl (Owners Corporations) [2017] VCAT 1550 (as at the date of this Blog, the Grundl decision was within the appeal period time frame).

Tisher Liner FC Law has a dedicated Owners Corporation legal division. If your Owners Corporation would like clear and practical legal advice about a particular issue, please do not hesitate to contact us on (03) 8600 9370 to become a valued client of Tisher Liner FC Law.

Related Articles

View All
Owners Corporations / Owners Corporations & Strata

Owners Corporations Act update – Form changes from Consumer Affairs Victoria

For Fee Notices and Final Notices, there is a new section about payment plans and financial hardship: “Payment Plans...
Read More
Owners Corporations / Owners Corporations & Strata

Loans to Owners Corporations – Tips and Tricks

The only option is a loan Section 25 of the Owners Corporations Act 2006 provides that by ordinary resolution, if the...
Read More
Owners Corporations / Owners Corporations & Strata

Owners Corporation case law update- Common property car park free for all! But not after VCAT intervenes

What is the case about The Tribunal sets out the facts as follows: The applicant, Mr Lim, is the owner of one of two...
Read More
Owners Corporations / Owners Corporations & Strata

Owners Corporation case law update- Developers and Managers beware!!

What was the case about The Owners Corporation (which only had 4 lots) sought recovery of $2,400 it says was illegally...
Read More
Owners Corporations / Owners Corporations & Strata

Owners Corporations Case law update- The Saint-John Decision- Lot owners have a right to emails and phone numbers!

Recently we wrote a blog about a lot owners right to access all of the lot owners emails and phone numbers That blog...
Read More
Owners Corporations / Owners Corporations & Strata

Pay up lot owners or lose your lot!

Some have a large amount of common property to look after which may include skyscraper buildings, roads and amenities...
Read More
Owners Corporations & Strata / Owners Corporations

Stop Suing Managers!! The Owners Corporation Manager

“The applicants seem to misunderstand the role of the manager The manager acts for and represents the Owners...
Read More
Owners Corporations / Owners Corporations & Strata

Owners Corporation case law update – Ford v Owners Corporation SP24717 (Owners Corporations) [2024] VCAT 547

The applicants sought the appointment of an administrator to an Owners Corporation which affects a residential...
Read More
Owners Corporations / Owners Corporations & Strata

Is this the death of short stay accommodation in apartment buildings in Victoria?

So, what is short stay accommodation Accommodation for a continuous period of less than 28 days The current definition...
Read More
Owners Corporations / Owners Corporations & Strata

Owners Corporation Case Law Update – Smith v Owners Corporation Plan No. RP002839 (Owners Corporations) [2024] VCAT 447

This case concerns a small 8 lot residential complex in East St Kilda There are two buildings, each with a stairwell...
Read More
Owners Corporations / Owners Corporations & Strata

Owners Corporation Case Law Update-Richardson Case – [2024] VCAT 582 -Amendments to plans of subdivision

The lot owners were not in agreement to amend the lot liability or lot entitlement Therefore, the only alternative, as...
Read More
Owners Corporations / Owners Corporations & Strata

Disclosure obligations for Strata Managers in Victoria: Access to owner’s contact information

There are two schools of thought Each owners corporation has four types of records: A lot owner has a right to access...
Read More