By Simon Abraham

16 November 2018

In a ground breaking decision delivered on 10 October 2018, the High Court set out exactly what happens when employees and competitors set out to steal clients through reliance upon confidential information or improper insider knowledge. Short answer… the fraudulent use of confidential insider information for a competitive edge will see the Court come down hard!

The case of Ancient Foresters in Victoria Friendly Society Limited v Lifeplan Australia Friendly Society Limited [2018] HCA 43 involved two senior employees of Lifeplan, a funeral business, who secretly approached a much smaller competitor, Foresters, with a five year business plan to use insider information to ‘steal’ Lifeplan’s clientele. The Board of Foresters agreed to the proposal and the business skyrocketed in size from $1.6m revenue to $24m revenue in two years.

Meanwhile, Lifeplan lost $23m in revenue in the same period. The Court held the employees personally liable (as expected), however in a remarkable turn of events, the Court further extrapolated the liability to additionally encompass Foresters’ business in its entirety. This additional liability was on the basis that Foresters knowingly assisted the employees’ fraud through engaging in the dishonest business plan.

This serves a clear warning to those who engage with or participate in breaches of fiduciary, director or employee duties. We live in a competitive world – but a competitor assisting in ‘dishonest and fraudulent’ conduct can be classified as ‘knowingly assisting’ the furtherance of such fraud.

Employees wishing to engage in commercial competition with their employer must not take any steps towards that endeavour until all association with the employer has ceased. The High Court took this reasoning one step further and held that where a competitive business knowingly assists in such dishonest behaviour, they too will be held liable and stand to potentially lose the entire net present value of their business. The profits received from the competitor in encouraging the fraudulent acts are one thing; however, the Court emphasised that the business connections made throughout such an endeavour convey far-reaching future benefits on the company. These future commercial benefits must be accounted for too as they would not have been realised but for the direct relationship with the dishonest employees.

The Court emphasised the need to deter all future persons from facilitating or engaging in such dishonest behaviour as a matter of principle and legal policy. The message is clear – if a business is built on foundations of fraud or breach of contract, then the competitor benefiting from the fruit of this poison tree can suffer severe financial consequences.

 

If you require advice surrounding Employment Law, please do not hesitate to contact Simon Abraham or a member of our Litigation & Dispute Resolution team.

 

Disclaimer
The material contained in this publication is meant to be informational only and is not to be construed as legal advice. Tisher Liner FC Law will not be held liable or responsible for any claim, which is made as a result of any person relying upon the information contained in this publication.

Related Articles

View All
Commercial Law / Commercial Contracts & Agreements / Employment Law

Payroll Tax – Medical Centres and Contracted Practitioners

  The recent SRO Ruling (PTA-041) on 11 August 2023, confirms the SRO’s stance on the payroll tax obligations of...
Read More
Commercial Contracts & Agreements / Employment Law / Litigation & Dispute Resolution

New Limitations On Fixed Term Employment Contracts – Employers need to know what they don’t know!

As of today (6 December 2023), there will be new rules that impact the use of fixed term employment contracts These are...
Read More
Employment Law / Litigation & Dispute Resolution / Commercial Contracts & Agreements

Real Estate Agent Commission Victory shakes up Fair Entitlements Guarantee (FEG) Scheme

Tisher Liner FC Law has been acting on behalf of one such ‘eligible employee’ over the past three (3) years Our...
Read More
Employment Law

Navigating Employment Law Changes – What Employers Need to Know Mid 2023 Part 2

As we enter the latter half of the year, it is imperative for employers and businesses to remain updated on the...
Read More
Employment Law

Navigating Employment Law Changes – What Employers Need to Know Mid 2023 Part 1

As we approach the halfway mark of the year, significant changes are underway in Australia’s employment law...
Read More
Commercial Law / Employment Law / Litigation & Dispute Resolution

International Women’s Day 2023: Embrace Equity

Have you ever wondered why the hallmark colours of International Women’s Day are vibrant purple, bold green and stark...
Read More
Employment Law

Employers Beware! – Minimum Wage increases take effect tomorrow

National Minimum Wage increase The Fair Work Commission has announced the National Minimum Wage (‘NMW’) will...
Read More
Employment Law

Psychiatric injury due to prolonged workplace trauma – a warning for employers from the High Court!

The much anticipated High Court decision of Kozarov v State of Victoria [2020] VSC 78 (Kozarov) has provided much...
Read More
Employment Law / Small to Medium Enterprises

Boosting workplace vaccinations – who needs a third dose?

What are the new vaccine mandates Beginning 12 January 2022, workers over 18 years of age in essential fields, unless...
Read More
Employment Law

‘R E S P E C T’- Part 2 – find out what it means…..for women

As foreshadowed in our previous article, the Federal Government has succumbed to public pressure and taken much needed...
Read More
Employment Law

Superannuation Increase – Who wears the cost?

From 1 July 2021, a superannuation (super) increase from 95% to 10% of employee’s ordinary time earnings will occur...
Read More
Employment Law

‘R E S P E C T’- find out what it means…..for employers

On 8 April 2021 the government publicly endorsed recommendations of the Respect@Work Report, commissioned by the Sex...
Read More