By Phillip Leaman

29 June 2020

Many owners corporations have issues with combustible cladding. A Malvern Road property's attempt to get a solution to avoid full replacement was not approved by the Building Appeals Board.

The Building Appeals Board has rejected a Malvern Owners Corporation’s application for a determination that partial removal of combustible cladding will comply with legal requirements, based on insufficient expert evidence.

An Owners Corporation for a mixed residential & retail building on Malvern Road, Malvern, that has almost one-quarter of its external surfaces clad with combustible expanded polystyrene cladding was issued with a building notice by the municipal building surveyor for the City of Stonnington in June 2018.  The building notice required the Owners Corporation to show, within 30 days, why the cladding should not be removed in 30 days.

The Owners Corporation decided to engage Roscon Property Services (“Roscon”) to prepare a fire engineer’s report to assess what work would be required to ensure the building complied with the relevant performance requirements of the National Construction Code.

The report prepared by Roscon dated 3 April 2019, and which was said to have been ‘authorised and approved’ by fire engineer, John Kendrick, gave an opinion that, subject to certain further remedial work being undertaken, the building could retain the existing combustible wall cladding and still meet the applicable fire safety performance requirements of the National Construction Code.

The Owners Corporation made an application to the Building Appeals Board for a ‘design determination’ under section 160A of the Building Act 1993 in reliance on the opinion in the Roscon Report to the effect that the combustible cladding could be retained subject to further remedial works being undertaken.

During the hearing, John Kendrick the fire engineer who appeared for the Owners Corporation in the Building Appeals Board proceeding and who had ‘authorised and approved’ the Roscon Report “…inexplicably…almost immediately conceded that all the [combustible cladding] should be removed from the building“, which was inconsistent with the opinion expressed in the Roscon Report that he had approved.

After hearing from the Chief Officer of the Melbourne Fire Brigade, the Victorian Building Authority and Mr. Kendrick, the Building Appeals Board did not accept the findings or recommendations expressed in the Roscon Report and found that the Roscon Report lacked probative value.

The Owners Corporation’s application for a building design determination based on the recommendations in the Roscon Report was therefore dismissed by the Building Appeals Board.

The Owners Corporation will now need to undertake further work to obtain a solution for the removal and replacement of the conbustible cladding.

We have experience in dealing with building defects concerning combustible cladding and with  Cladding Safety Victoria for high risk buildings that are part of the government funded scheme.

It is important that a fire services engineer carefully reviews the work required to comply with any building order to ensure that the Building Appeals Board accepts the proposed course of action.

For legal assistance with building defect issues concerning Owners Corporations please contact Phillip Leaman or one of the Owners Corporation Team.

Related Articles

View All
Owners Corporations / Owners Corporations & Strata

Owners Corporations Case law update- Benefit Principle

So what is the case The case is Bradley Scott Schembri Furniture Finishes Pty Ltd v Owners Corporation No PS334220X...
Read More
Owners Corporations / Owners Corporations & Strata

Owners Corporations Case Law update- Stop that Noise!

So what is the case The case is JRVT Pty Ltd v Traczyk (Owners Corporations) [2025] VCAT 108 What is it about This...
Read More
Owners Corporations / Owners Corporations & Strata

Owners Corporations Case Law update – Water ingress into lots from common property?

What is it about The applicant seeks repairs and damages from the Owners Corporation for a damp concrete slab in the...
Read More
Owners Corporations / Owners Corporations & Strata

Owners Corporations Case law update- Lot owner asks VCAT to change the AGM Minutes please! VCAT says “No”.

What is it about The case is about a lot owner who sought various orders including: The applicant sought an order...
Read More
Owners Corporations / Owners Corporations & Strata

Smokers keep your smoke out of my space!

Luckily for non smokers the model rules for Owners Corporations was changed in 2021 in an effort to address smoke drift...
Read More
Owners Corporations / Owners Corporations & Strata

Developers know your obligations

But what does a developer need to provide to an OC Section 67 of the Owners Corporations Act 2006 provides a...
Read More
Owners Corporations / Owners Corporations & Strata

Committees- a recap on the legal technicalities associated with committee elections and membership

Any lot owner or a proxy is eligible to be on the committee unless at the time of the vote they are not financial If a...
Read More
Owners Corporations / Owners Corporations & Strata

When the Owners Corporation has no funds – what do you do?

So how does the Owners Corporation fund such works Hopefully there is a maintenance fund that deals with likely capital...
Read More
Owners Corporations / Owners Corporations & Strata

Owners Corporations Act update – Form changes from Consumer Affairs Victoria

For Fee Notices and Final Notices, there is a new section about payment plans and financial hardship: “Payment Plans...
Read More
Owners Corporations / Owners Corporations & Strata

Loans to Owners Corporations – Tips and Tricks

The only option is a loan Section 25 of the Owners Corporations Act 2006 provides that by ordinary resolution, if the...
Read More
Owners Corporations / Owners Corporations & Strata

Owners Corporation case law update- Common property car park free for all! But not after VCAT intervenes

What is the case about The Tribunal sets out the facts as follows: The applicant, Mr Lim, is the owner of one of two...
Read More
Owners Corporations / Owners Corporations & Strata

Owners Corporation case law update- Developers and Managers beware!!

What was the case about The Owners Corporation (which only had 4 lots) sought recovery of $2,400 it says was illegally...
Read More