Members of Tisher Liner FC Law are experienced in representing clients in Mediations and Dennis Liner has conducted hundreds of Mediations for a period exceeding twenty years.

We asked Dennis to explain in his experience why people embrace the Mediation process. He sets our various reasons:-

1 – Costs

Participating in Mediation when matters are subject to Court proceedings (or such proceedings are contemplated) is a cost-effective manner in which to resolve a dispute. The obvious alternative is to conduct litigation which is extremely expensive, requiring significant preparation, documentation, appearances and all the associated steps relevant to conducting a Court case.

2 – Time

Most Court cases require a considerable amount of input by way of time, seeing Lawyers, Counsel, attendances at Court etc. The time required to devote to a Mediation would usually involve considerably less preparation and usually the matter is resolved in a Mediation in one day, as opposed to even a short case in Court which may run over many days.

3 – Certainty

Although achieving a result by way of settlement or otherwise in a Mediation is not compulsory, by participating in a Mediation and having a matter resolved, there is certainty as to the outcome. Any Court proceeding will depend on the presentation and interpretation of evidence (including Experts), a finding by a Judge as to such facts and than applying the Law and these two variables can have outcomes which may not be favourable. The Mediation process enables a result to be achieved and at the end of the process each party knows the outcome with certainty.

4 – Making your own decisions

Most people prefer to make their own decisions. The Mediation process permits a party to a dispute to make a decision about an outcome and, even if the outcome is not precisely that which a participant would have liked at the commencement of the process, at least a participant has made the decision. Experience shows that most people prefer to be in a position of making their own decisions and living with such decisions afterwards.

5 – Flexibility in the outcome

Parties to a Mediation are able to negotiate outcomes in a manner which may not be ordered by a Court. There are no right or wrong outcomes, only those that the participants may adopt. The result may be outside any prior preconceived outcome. If the parties decide to agree, even if such outcome was not what a participant would have originally contemplated, then the matter is finalised and everyone can get on with their usual business and life activities.

Accordingly, most parties prefer to avoid Court proceedings and would prefer to participate in a Mediation because of costs, time, certainty and being able to make their own decisions.

Related Articles

View All
Leasing & Lease Disputes / Property & Development / Property & Developers

Commercial Leases – Protect your Property

By the end of the lease (whether by expiry, abandonment or eviction) things may look different And you may need to...
Read More
Business Law / Commercial Contracts & Agreements / Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Corporate Divorce – The Importance of Prompt Damage Control

When good companies fail due to deteriorating business relationships, there is often a cast of familiar players: 1 The...
Read More
Construction / Litigation & Dispute Resolution / Property & Development

Domestic Building Dispute Resolution – New Regime

The days of VCAT being a first-instance negotiator in Victorian domestic building disputes are coming to an end...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Don’t be scared of a subpoena

A subpoena can be a daunting document Expressed as an order of a Court, a subpoena requires the person served to either...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Who Says that Compliance with a Subpoena Cannot be Profitable?

There is a price for this though A party issuing a subpoena must usually pay the reasonable expenses incurred by the...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution / Commercial Contracts & Agreements / Business Law

Handshake Agreements and the 100 million dollar bar coaster – Why it pays to speak to a litigator

In 2006 our firm successfully enforced an agreement between shareholders in an unlisted company based on nothing more...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution / Owners Corporation / Owners Corporations & Strata

Owners Corporations and Litigation Strategy in VCAT.

A recent VCAT case involved self-represented lot owners and an Owners Corporation suing various repair contractors, the...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution / Retail Clients & Chains

Keep your diary well!

One aspect which often lets businesses down when the need arises to enforce a debt is the lack of adequate details...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution / Employment Law / Commercial Contracts & Agreements

Interference with Contractual Relations- Issues when poaching employees of a competitor.

When does an approach to ‘poach’ a person contracted elsewhere cross the line between making a lawful offer to a...
Read More