By Didi Levin

12 March 2019

A donor who donates to a DGR may be entitled to a tax deduction even where the donor receives public recognition in return for the donation.

Typically, when a donor donates funds to an entity that is endorsed as a tax-deductible gift recipient (DGR), the donor is entitled to receive in return a tax-deductible receipt for the amount of the donation. The donor can submit this receipt to the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) to reduce the donor’s personal taxable income for the given financial year, by the amount of the donation.

Broadly, the above applies, where a donation is made entirely as a gift, with no advantage or benefit flowing to the donor (other than the right to a tax-deductible receipt). In Leary v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1980) 11 ATR 145 (“Leary”), the Federal Court of Australia stated that a donation or gift must be given in a spirit of “detached and disinterested generosity”.

Sometimes, donors donate or gift funds to DGRs and receive some form of public recognition as a result. This often takes the form of a plaque, sign or notice acknowledging a donor’s generosity, or buildings, campuses and projects named after donors or family members of donors.

Do these forms of public recognition constitute an advantage or benefit to the donor that would set aside that donor’s right to receive a tax-deductible receipt for their donation?

Again in Leary, the Federal Court noted (in obiter) that “a man may, by his gifts, gain fame or formal honours without losing his tax deductions”.

This position is further reinforced by the following example contained in the ATO Tax Ruling 2005/13:

“S, a wealthy businessman decides to make a gift of $5 million to the public hospital (a DGR) in his area for the purpose of building a new wing to treat people suffering from alcoholism. S stipulates that the new wing should be named the ‘Frederick S Wing’. In order to recognise S’s generosity, the hospital will name the new wing in his honour. It will also acknowledge the gift by placing a plaque acknowledging his generosity in the foyer of the new building. The naming is not a material benefit, and paragraph 78A(2)(c) of the ITAA 1936 will not apply. The obligation he imposed does not detract from a finding that the transfer was by way of benefaction on the hospital. On the other hand, recognition accorded to the giver for purposes of commercial advertising is a material benefit. Sponsorships of DGRs by commercial entities generally fall into this category. Such outgoings, however, may be income tax deductible as business expenses.”

It seems clear from this example that a private donor can generally receive public recognition without losing their right to a tax deduction. Otherwise a business donating for commercial advertising purposes may need to claim their tax deduction as a business expense rather than as a tax-deductible donation.

Notwithstanding, the case law and tax rulings do not seem to cover a scenario where a donation by a private (non-business) donor is made conditional on a certain form of public recognition to the extent that the donor will only gift the funds if they receive a specified type of public recognition in return (e.g. a name on a building or project). In this situation, we would encourage donors and/or recipients of funds to seek a private ruling from the ATO, to confirm that the donor is entitled to a tax deduction on the facts of the particular case.


For more advice on charity or not-for-profit law please contact Didi Levin or a member of our Charities Team.


The material contained in this publication is meant to be informational only and is not to be construed as legal advice. Tisher Liner FC Law will not be held liable or responsible for any claim, which is made as a result of any person relying upon the information contained in this publication.

Related Articles

View All
Charities & Not-for-Profit / Charities & Not-For-Profits

Beware! Charities Operating Overseas Are Now Under New Scrutiny

The new standards are expected to come into effect on 1 July 2019 and will be binding upon all charities operating...
Read More
Charities & Not-for-Profit / Business Law / Charities & Not-For-Profits

“I’m Just a Volunteer” – Liability of Directors or Committees of Not-for-Profits

Often though, the volunteer nature of these organisations may contribute to a failure by the organisation, its’...
Read More
Charities & Not-for-Profit / Charities & Not-For-Profits

Tax-deductible opportunities for Indigenous charities

The school, focused upon educating Aboriginal members of its local community, was previously registered as a charity...
Read More
Charities & Not-for-Profit / Charities & Not-For-Profits

What to Do if You’ve Been Asked to Run a Charity

If you have been asked by a charity to assume a governance position, then you should definitely be aware of all of your...
Read More
Australia-Israel Legal Advice / Charities & Not-for-Profit / Technology and Start Ups

TLFC – Award Finalist for Law Firm of the Year (Medium Category)

Tisher Liner FC are proud to be nominated as an award finalist in the 14th annual Victorian Legal Awards Medium Law...
Read More
Charities & Not-for-Profit / Business Law / Charities & Not-For-Profits

Tax Effective Giving – Charitable Distributions Through Discretionary and Charitable Trusts

With a discretionary trust, the trustee determines which of the beneficiaries will receive trust income and the timing...
Read More
Charities & Not-for-Profit / Technology and Start Ups / Construction

TLFC Expands with the Merger of Warlows Legal

The merger will increase the range of expert legal services offered by TLFC Warlows Legal Managing Partner, Harriet...
Read More