By Simon Abraham

5 August 2015

I have a confession to make, I love Handshake Agreements. Why? Because I am a commercial litigator and they give me a lot of work.

In 2006 our firm successfully enforced an agreement between shareholders in an unlisted company based on nothing more than oral evidence and an IOU signed on the back of a bar coaster. The Court held there was a constructive trust.

It is amazing how often people will enter into a partnership, investment or supply of goods agreement on little more than a handshake. Sometimes clients don’t know how to enforce such agreements or even whether such agreements are enforceable.

Would I allow a client to knowingly make a Handshake Agreement or enter into any other agreement that is oral, undocumented or otherwise based purely on trust – no. However, inevitably, many business people will ignore the above advice and conduct themselves purely on the basis of “Handshake Agreements”.

As the old maxim goes, “an agreement with a gentleman need never be referenced again whereas an agreement with a rogue is not worth the paper it is written upon”.

The problem comes into view when it comes time to sue the rogue or, alternatively, defend an unmeritorious law suit brought by a rogue. The presence or absence of a written agreement is the first thing that a Court is likely to note.

A Handshake Agreement (sometimes also known as an Oral Contract or a Gentlemen’s Agreement) can be successfully enforced – and good supporting evidence will help.

Information created and transmitted electronically such as emails, text messages and even Facebook messages and Twitter posts can also be admitted as evidence by Courts. We can advise you in relation to these matters.

The best policy is always to have a ‘handshake agreement’ recorded in writing at the beginning – otherwise you could find yourself shaking hands with a whole team of litigators.

And what about our bar coaster client?

He has continued to receive dividend payments pursuant to his constructive trust for nearly a decade. In the past week, the Company in which he holds a constructive trust over a parcel of shares was sold for an amount in excess of $ 100 million dollars and he’s a very happy man.


For more information please contact Simon Abraham or a member of the Dispute Resolution Team.

Related Articles

View All
Employment Law / Litigation & Dispute Resolution / Intellectual Property

Dude, Where’s my Business? High Court Delivers Warning to Employees and Competitors who engage in Dishonest Conduct to Get Ahead in the Game

The case of Ancient Foresters in Victoria Friendly Society Limited v Lifeplan Australia Friendly Society Limited [2018]...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution

The Road to Mediation: the benefits of alternative dispute resolution

For instance, many contracts and agreements include a ‘dispute resolution’ clause The dispute resolution clause...
Read More
Employment Law / Litigation & Dispute Resolution / Construction

Does it Really Matter What You Call Your Employees? The Difference Between a Permanent and a Casual Employee.

The Federal Court found the casual employee worked a regular and continuous pattern of work for more than two years,...
Read More
Property & Development / Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Subpoenas: think twice before pushing the button

In a recent decision of the Supreme Court of Victoria, Brady Queen Pty Ltd and 280 Queen Street Pty Ltd & Anor (No...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution / Property & Development / Developments

Rules of Thumb for Purchasing a Property

Good advice is only going to benefit you if you take advantage of it This applies whatever your purpose for the...
Read More
Technology and Start Ups / Litigation & Dispute Resolution / Privacy Laws & Trading Terms

High Court Finds Google’s Search Engine has the Capacity to Defame

For many years, Google has claimed that its search engine has no capacity to defame Effectively, Google has argued that...
Read More
Australia-Israel Legal Advice / Charities & Not-for-Profit / Technology and Start Ups

TLFC – Award Finalist for Law Firm of the Year (Medium Category)

Tisher Liner FC are proud to be nominated as an award finalist in the 14th annual Victorian Legal Awards Medium Law...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Public Examinations – Inquisition or Corporate Karma?

Regardless of this clause, A2Z alleged that McDonalds terminated the cleaning contract with only one day’s notice,...
Read More
Business Law / Commercial Contracts & Agreements / Intellectual Property

It Won’t Happen To Us! We Know Each Other – We Don’t Need an Agreement

The material considerations relevant to your interest, whether it be a property development, joint venture,...
Read More
Property & Development / Litigation & Dispute Resolution

A Timely Reminder of the Underquoting Laws

During that period Consumer Affairs Victoria (CAV), the Regulatory Body that governs real estate agents, has...
Read More
Leasing & Lease Disputes / Property & Development / Developments

Commercial Leases – Protect your Property

By the end of the lease (whether by expiry, abandonment or eviction) things may look different And you may need to...
Read More
Business Law / Commercial Contracts & Agreements / Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Corporate Divorce – The Importance of Prompt Damage Control

When good companies fail due to deteriorating business relationships, there is often a cast of familiar players: 1 The...
Read More