By Briana Kotzapavlidis

24 November 2017

Pre-nups or any agreement entered into before, during or after a marriage or defacto relationship, when properly prepared and executed, can give parties some comfort about how their assets are likely to be divided (if at all) in the event of a separation.

Once signed, after both parties have had the benefit of independent legal advice, a Financial Agreement (including a pre-nup ) is and remains binding and enforceable unless the parties agree in writing to terminate it, or the agreement is set aside by the Court.

There can be no guarantee that one of the separated parties might not make a future application to the Court to seek to set the agreement aside, with a view to obtaining a larger property settlement or spousal maintenance package. Whilst there is no way of making a financial agreement “watertight” (that is, absolutely excluding a set aside application), an experienced and qualified family law practitioners we will guide and advise you about the best way to protect your interests in the future.

The recent High Court decision in Thorne and Kennedy (8 November 2017) has not changed or expanded the grounds upon which a party can seek to set an agreement aside. However, the decision highlights that the overarching fairness or otherwise of the terms of the agreement may be one factor (amongst a number and range of factors) that may be taken into account if one party makes an application to set the agreement aside.

The Court, in deciding whether or not a Financial Agreement should be set aside, may also look at factors such as whether the agreement was offered on the basis that the terms were not open for negotiation (that is, on a “take it or leave it” basis), the nature of the parties’ relationship and their respective financial positions, the emotional circumstances in which the agreement was entered including any threat to end a relationship, engagement or marriage if the agreement is not signed and whether there has been time for the parties to carefully reflect and consider both the agreement and the independent legal advice they had received before signing the agreement.

In Thorne and Kennedy the High Court was satisfied that the agreement should be set aside as it had been procured by undue influence and unconscionable conduct; that is the Wife did not enter into the agreement of her own free will and she was under a special disadvantage (including by reason of circumstances created and exacerbated by the husband) and it was wrong of the husband to knowingly have her sign the agreement.

Like all aspects of Family Law, each and every Financial Agreement is unique to the parties who seek to enter into it and should be carefully and cautiously drafted and tailored to best meet those parties’ needs.

 

If you would like to discuss this further, please do not hesitate to contact Briana Kotzapavlidis or a member of our Family Law Team.

Related Articles

View All
Family Law

Estranged husband’s consent not required for IVF treatment

The ART Act required the consent of her partner, in this case her husband, from whom she has been separated for less...
Read More
Business Law / Construction / Employment Law

September 2018 Newsletter

September 2018 Newsletter See the full newsletter here Welcome TLFC Law are pleased to welcome Min Seetoh to the...
Read More
Family Law

The long Term Impact of Separation and Divorce on Children

In the Carter & Carter [2018] FamCAFC45, the Full Court of the Family Court granted an adult child access to their...
Read More
Family Law

Not “just an agreement“: Independent Legal Advice and Financial Agreements

Each party’s lawyer must sign a Statement of Independent Legal Advice, confirming that this requirement has been met...
Read More
Family Law

Spousal Maintenance Claims and the Case of Elei & Dodt: The Importance of Crossing your T’s and Dodting your Eleis

In a recent appeal case released under the pseudonym, Elei & Dodt [2018], Justice Ryan considered whether the...
Read More
Family Law

Do you have a Child Support Debt? Be Aware of International Travel Bans

A DPO is an international travel ban, which gives Border Force the power to stop a person who owes child support at the...
Read More
Australia-Israel Legal Advice / Charities & Not-for-Profit / Technology and Start Ups

TLFC – Award Finalist for Law Firm of the Year (Medium Category)

Tisher Liner FC are proud to be nominated as an award finalist in the 14th annual Victorian Legal Awards Medium Law...
Read More
Family Law

Avoiding the ‘Perennial Football Match’: When Can Final Parenting Orders be Changed?

The principle, borne from the 1978 case of Rice v Asplund, is that the Court can only revisit final parenting orders...
Read More
Family Law

Private School Fees – Who Pays Post-Separation?

Private school expenses includes fees, levies and charges, camps, excursions, computers/devices, books, stationery,...
Read More
Family Law

What did you call me? The process of changing a child’s name at law

One common example is when the mother retains primary care of a child who has historically carried the father’s...
Read More
Family Law

“Clean Hands” in Family Law

If you have separated from your spouse, you may feel that your financial affairs are no longer any of your spouse’s...
Read More