By Andrea Bunn

4 June 2019

When the Court makes parenting orders, it is presumed that it is in the best interests of a child that both its parents have equal shared parental responsibility.

This presumption does not relate to the amount of time a child is to spend with their parents, but the parents’ ability to make joint decisions regarding the long-term care and welfare of the child. Major long term decisions include decisions about the child’s education, health and, as will be discussed in this blog post, the child’s religious and cultural practices.

The presumption may be rebutted if it can be proven that it would not be in the child’s best interests. That is, if the Court is satisfied that it is in the best interests of the children for only one parent to have responsibility for decision making. The two primary considerations for the Court is, in order of priority, first, the right of the child to be protected from harm and, secondly, the child’s right to have a meaningful relationship with each parent.

In the case of Zenere & Malik and Ors [2018] FamCA 795, although the mother consented to the father assuming sole parenting responsibility for their three year old daughter upon her impending death, the mother sought to restrain the father’s ability to involve the child in or expose her to his religious practices and that the father be restrained from travelling overseas with the child to India (or any other non-Hague Convention country) until she turned 14.

Both parties were of Indian heritage and both observed the Hindu faith. Prior to separation, the father had travelled to India and participated in a religious retreat in an ashram that, in the mother’s opinion, adopted unconventional practices and which she described as “extreme”. Some of the practices and beliefs advocated by the ashram (as deposed to by the mother) included veganism, periods of fasting and feasting, spiritual healing and a belief in telekinesis. The mother also raised concerns about allegations of sexual abuse levelled at the ashram.

While on the retreat the father messaged the mother and announced his desire to separate and to live in India permanently (presumably at the ashram). Shortly thereafter the mother was diagnosed with terminal cancer. The parties’ parenting matters came on for Trial in September 2018 and on the first day of Trial the parents (and the maternal grandparents who had been joined to the proceedings) resolved all matters relating to the child’s care arrangements by consent with the exception of the issue of the father’s religion and his ability to travel with the child to India.

The court found in this case that

“[i]t is not a matter for the Court to analyse any particular faith but simply to decide whether the adherence of a parent to that faith represents a risk to that child… there is a balance for the Court between the welfare of the child and neutrality as to different religious views and practices.”

In this case, the court held that the father’s religious beliefs did not represent a risk to the child and therefore decided not to make the orders as sought by the mother. The court noted that the mother was otherwise confident in the father’s parenting capacity and there was no evidence before the court to suggest that he would not act responsibly to ensure the child was safely and appropriately exposed to his faith. Further the court suggested that exposure to differing belief systems would provide the child with the opportunity “to understand that people have different ideas”.

Further, the court decided not to restrain the father from travelling with the child to India (or any other non-Hague Convention country) until the child was 14 finding that this would be “an unnecessary restraint on the ordinary course of his life”.

Navigating the parenting relationship post separation (and making joint decisions together) is often a delicate exercise requiring diplomacy and compromise. This is especially so when parents are confronted with contentious issues such as religion, which school to enrol their child or whether both parents consent to their child undergoing a medical procedure or travelling overseas (to name just a few ‘sticking points’ that often arise in family law matters). It is always preferable for parents to reach agreement on such issues, but when they cannot be resolved, the Court will determine what it considers (at its discretion) will be in the best interests of the child.

 

For more information or assistance with your parenting matter, do not hesitate to contact Andrea Bunn or a member of our Family Law Team.

 

Disclaimer
The material contained in this publication is meant to be informational only and is not to be construed as legal advice. Tisher Liner FC Law will not be held liable or responsible for any claim, which is made as a result of any person relying upon the information contained in this publication.

Related Articles

View All
Family Law

Contravention Applications in Parenting Cases: “Self-help” is not a defence

If your former partner is failing to facilitate your time or communication with the children, or is not complying with...
Read More
Family Law

Time’s up, but can I still issue property proceedings?

Those deadlines exist for good reason Potential defendants should eventually be able to rest easy knowing that...
Read More
Family Law

Navigating the Complicated and Confusing Issues Around Child Support

The father argued that exceptional circumstances had arisen since the agreement was made because the child now lived...
Read More
Family Law

Til debt do us part: High Court rules on transferring tax debt in family law matters

In this matter, the husband and wife married in 1992 and separated in July 2009 During the marriage the wife incurred...
Read More
Family Law

Frequently Asked Questions in Family Law

Principal Briana Kotzapavlidis has compiled the top 10 questions she gets asked by clients 1 What practical and...
Read More
Family Law

Estranged husband’s consent not required for IVF treatment

The ART Act required the consent of her partner, in this case her husband, from whom she has been separated for less...
Read More
Business Law / Construction / Employment Law

September 2018 Newsletter

September 2018 Newsletter See the full newsletter here Welcome TLFC Law are pleased to welcome Min Seetoh to the...
Read More
Family Law

The long Term Impact of Separation and Divorce on Children

In the Carter & Carter [2018] FamCAFC45, the Full Court of the Family Court granted an adult child access to their...
Read More
Family Law

Not “just an agreement“: Independent Legal Advice and Financial Agreements

Each party’s lawyer must sign a Statement of Independent Legal Advice, confirming that this requirement has been met...
Read More
Family Law

Spousal Maintenance Claims and the Case of Elei & Dodt: The Importance of Crossing your T’s and Dodting your Eleis

In a recent appeal case released under the pseudonym, Elei & Dodt [2018], Justice Ryan considered whether the...
Read More
Family Law

Do you have a Child Support Debt? Be Aware of International Travel Bans

A DPO is an international travel ban, which gives Border Force the power to stop a person who owes child support at the...
Read More