By Phoebe Langridge

26 July 2017

A subpoena can be a daunting document.

Expressed as an order of a Court, a subpoena requires the person served to either attend Court to give evidence, produce documents to a Court or both. Most commonly, recipients of subpoenas automatically comply with the subpoena because they assume they must do so. However, there are a number of bases upon which a subpoena can be challenged.

Things to consider when served with a subpoena include:

Subpoenas to Produce Documents

If you receive a subpoena to produce documents, before complying with it, you should consider:

1.  Is the scope of the documents requested too wide?

If the scope of the documents requested in the subpoena is too wide, in that it doesn’t specify with reasonable particularity the documents to be produced, it may be considered to be too onerous and need to be narrowed to provide sufficient particularity.

2.  Are the documents subject to legal professional privilege?

If the documents requested are private communications between you and your lawyer and therefore privileged they must still be provided to the Court but in an envelope marked “privileged”. The Court will not allow the issuing party or any other parties to see the documents unless they can convince the Court that the documents are not privileged.

3.  Are the documents commercially sensitive?

If the documents requested in the subpoena are commercially sensitive you can seek a confidentiality undertaking from the party inspecting the documents or which limits who can inspect the documents.

Subpoenas to give Evidence

If you are issued with a subpoena to give evidence, you must attend that stated Court on the date and at the time listed in the subpoena. If you do not attend Court on that date and at that time, you may be considered to be in contempt of court and liable to a penalty.

The issuing party must attach conduct money to the subpoena to give evidence. The purpose of conduct money is to cover the subpoenaed party’s reasonable expenses of travel to attend to give evidence.

If the issuing party has served the subpoena out of time or failed to provide conduct money you may have the right to refuse to attend Court to give evidence. However, it is important you obtain legal advice before refusing to attend Court.

Additional Expenses

In some instances an application can be made to the Court for the reimbursement of “reasonable expenses” incurred by the subpoenaed party in addition to conduct money. Applications of this kind may include expenses for legal advice, photocopying expenses, additional travel expenses or other reasonable costs which have been incurred by the subpoenaed party in complying with the subpoena.

Knowing your rights and getting good legal advice can be paramount to limiting the time and expense incurred with complying with third party subpoenas. For further information and advice, please contact a member of our Litigation & Dispute Resolution Team.

Related Articles

View All
Leasing & Lease Disputes / Property & Development / Property & Developers

Commercial Leases – Protect your Property

By the end of the lease (whether by expiry, abandonment or eviction) things may look different And you may need to...
Read More
Business Law / Commercial Contracts & Agreements / Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Corporate Divorce – The Importance of Prompt Damage Control

When good companies fail due to deteriorating business relationships, there is often a cast of familiar players: 1 The...
Read More
Construction / Litigation & Dispute Resolution / Property & Development

Domestic Building Dispute Resolution – New Regime

The days of VCAT being a first-instance negotiator in Victorian domestic building disputes are coming to an end...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Who Says that Compliance with a Subpoena Cannot be Profitable?

There is a price for this though A party issuing a subpoena must usually pay the reasonable expenses incurred by the...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution / Commercial Contracts & Agreements / Business Law

Handshake Agreements and the 100 million dollar bar coaster – Why it pays to speak to a litigator

In 2006 our firm successfully enforced an agreement between shareholders in an unlisted company based on nothing more...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution / Owners Corporation / Owners Corporations & Strata

Owners Corporations and Litigation Strategy in VCAT.

A recent VCAT case involved self-represented lot owners and an Owners Corporation suing various repair contractors, the...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution / Retail Clients & Chains

Keep your diary well!

One aspect which often lets businesses down when the need arises to enforce a debt is the lack of adequate details...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Why Mediate?

We asked Dennis to explain in his experience why people embrace the Mediation process He sets our various reasons:- 1...
Read More
Litigation & Dispute Resolution / Employment Law / Commercial Contracts & Agreements

Interference with Contractual Relations- Issues when poaching employees of a competitor.

When does an approach to ‘poach’ a person contracted elsewhere cross the line between making a lawful offer to a...
Read More