Everyone secretly loves observing chaos (as long as they are not in it).  That’s why people slow down to look at car accidents.

Up until recently, businesses have relied upon ‘gig’ workers being able to be classified as independent contractors due to working for a number of platforms at the same time and have avoided paying employee related entitlements.

 

The recent Deliveroo decision (see below) means businesses should proceed with caution when assessing whether or not to engage independent contractors.

Recent decision for all businesses to be aware of- Franco v Deliveroo Australia Pty Ltd [2021] FWC 2818 (‘Deliveroo’)

 

This recent decision has revealed division in the Fair Work Commission as it contradicts a 2020 full bench decision which found that Ubereats drivers are not employees.

 

How the Deliveroo decision impacts businesses?

Gig workers have been at the centre of the employee vs contractor debate for some time now.

 

Business owners have a history of classifying workers as contractors to avoid paying employee entitlements and protection under unfair dismissal legislation.

 

Although, Deliveroo will appeal this decision it is prudent for all companies who employ ‘gig’ workers to look at the ‘complete picture’ in determining whether or not there is an employment or a true independent contractor relationship.

 

Factors to consider when assessing whether or not a ‘gig’ worker is an employee or independent contractor

  1. Is the ‘gig’ worker carrying on a trade or business of their own/have their own ABN?
  2. Is it the ‘gig’ workers primary source of income?
  3. Who has control over when and how the work is performed?
  4. Does the worker have to wear a uniform?
  5. Does the business measure or monitor the worker’s performance?
  6. Can the worker subcontract work?

 

These are just some of the many factors an employer, director or business owner should consider when determining whether or not there is an employment or contractor relationship.

 

Hefty penalties apply to businesses who incorrectly classify employees as contractors – $13,320 for individuals and $66,600 for corporations per contravention.

 

There is no doubt that the law is unclear and has struggled to evolve as career opportunities move away from more traditional employment.

 

This ambiguity will inevitably be dealt with by the High Court but in the meantime please do not hesitate to contact our employment team if your business is uncertain as to whether your workers or suppliers are contractors or casual employees.

Related Articles

View All
Commercial Law / Commercial Contracts & Agreements / Employment Law

Payroll Tax – Medical Centres and Contracted Practitioners

  The recent SRO Ruling (PTA-041) on 11 August 2023, confirms the SRO’s stance on the payroll tax obligations of...
Read More
Commercial Contracts & Agreements / Employment Law / Litigation & Dispute Resolution

New Limitations On Fixed Term Employment Contracts – Employers need to know what they don’t know!

As of today (6 December 2023), there will be new rules that impact the use of fixed term employment contracts These are...
Read More
Employment Law / Litigation & Dispute Resolution / Commercial Contracts & Agreements

Real Estate Agent Commission Victory shakes up Fair Entitlements Guarantee (FEG) Scheme

Tisher Liner FC Law has been acting on behalf of one such ‘eligible employee’ over the past three (3) years Our...
Read More
Employment Law

Navigating Employment Law Changes – What Employers Need to Know Mid 2023 Part 2

As we enter the latter half of the year, it is imperative for employers and businesses to remain updated on the...
Read More
Employment Law

Navigating Employment Law Changes – What Employers Need to Know Mid 2023 Part 1

As we approach the halfway mark of the year, significant changes are underway in Australia’s employment law...
Read More
Commercial Law / Employment Law / Litigation & Dispute Resolution

International Women’s Day 2023: Embrace Equity

Have you ever wondered why the hallmark colours of International Women’s Day are vibrant purple, bold green and stark...
Read More
Employment Law

Employers Beware! – Minimum Wage increases take effect tomorrow

National Minimum Wage increase The Fair Work Commission has announced the National Minimum Wage (‘NMW’) will...
Read More
Employment Law

Psychiatric injury due to prolonged workplace trauma – a warning for employers from the High Court!

The much anticipated High Court decision of Kozarov v State of Victoria [2020] VSC 78 (Kozarov) has provided much...
Read More
Employment Law / Small to Medium Enterprises

Boosting workplace vaccinations – who needs a third dose?

What are the new vaccine mandates Beginning 12 January 2022, workers over 18 years of age in essential fields, unless...
Read More
Employment Law

‘R E S P E C T’- Part 2 – find out what it means…..for women

As foreshadowed in our previous article, the Federal Government has succumbed to public pressure and taken much needed...
Read More
Employment Law

Superannuation Increase – Who wears the cost?

From 1 July 2021, a superannuation (super) increase from 95% to 10% of employee’s ordinary time earnings will occur...
Read More
Employment Law

‘R E S P E C T’- find out what it means…..for employers

On 8 April 2021 the government publicly endorsed recommendations of the Respect@Work Report, commissioned by the Sex...
Read More