By Andrea Bunn

13 August 2019

Section 106B of The Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) (“The Act”) provides the Court with a wide range of “claw back” powers to deal with (and potentially alter) separated parties’ interests in property.

Provided the Court is satisfied that it is just and equitable in all the circumstances to make any property order, the first step for the court is to identify (and value) the parties’ current interest in net assets. Property may include real estate, funds in the bank, shares, business interests and the like, irrespective of whether the asset is held in either name or the joint names of the parties.

What if that property has been transferred to a third party or otherwise disposed of by a party to family court proceedings?

Section 106B of the Act provides the court with the power to set aside (i.e. reverse) a sale or transfer of an asset of the relationship, in circumstances where:-

  • the transfer occurred whilst either family court proceedings were underway; or
  • were reasonably anticipated; and
  • the disposition of the property is ‘likely to defeat’ an existing or anticipated court order.

The court is empowered to reverse a transaction pursuant to section 106B, irrespective of the disposing party’s intentions. For example, if around the time of your separation you were to sell your property or sell your share in a company to a third party, it is within the court’s power to make orders to join the purchaser to the proceedings (once underway) and order for the sale or transaction to be reversed or “clawed back”.

While section 106B(3) of the Act requires the court to “have regard to the interests of… a bona fide purchaser or other person interested” this is no sure safe guard. Although it is mandatory that the court consider the purchaser’s interest, it is at the court’s discretion whether it makes any orders to protect the purchaser’s interest, and if so, what orders will be made.

A bona fide purchaser is someone who purchases an asset for value and without prior notice of another party (e.g. the vendor’s spouse) having an interest in the asset.

While the court will generally try to avoid interfering with the commercial interests of genuine third party purchasers, the court will be minded to reverse a transaction where it prejudices a just and equitable outcome in the family court proceedings. Further, as the court held in Balnaves v Balnaves [1988] FamCA 6 the court will not allow a “blatant sham transaction to defeat the operation of the [Family Law] Act”.

Parties (and third party purchasers who are on notice of an impending family law matter) should take care when dealing with their property interests in the wake of a separation.

 

For more information or assistance with your family law matter, do not hesitate to contact Andrea Bunn or a member of our Family Law Team.

 

Disclaimer
The material contained in this publication is meant to be informational only and is not to be construed as legal advice. Tisher Liner FC Law will not be held liable or responsible for any claim, which is made as a result of any person relying upon the information contained in this publication.

Related Articles

View All
Family Law

Contravention Applications in Parenting Cases: “Self-help” is not a defence

If your former partner is failing to facilitate your time or communication with the children, or is not complying with...
Read More
Family Law

Navigating Family Law: Religion

This presumption does not relate to the amount of time a child is to spend with their parents, but the parents’...
Read More
Family Law

Time’s up, but can I still issue property proceedings?

Those deadlines exist for good reason Potential defendants should eventually be able to rest easy knowing that...
Read More
Family Law

Navigating the Complicated and Confusing Issues Around Child Support

The father argued that exceptional circumstances had arisen since the agreement was made because the child now lived...
Read More
Family Law

Til debt do us part: High Court rules on transferring tax debt in family law matters

In this matter, the husband and wife married in 1992 and separated in July 2009 During the marriage the wife incurred...
Read More
Family Law

Frequently Asked Questions in Family Law

Principal Briana Kotzapavlidis has compiled the top 10 questions she gets asked by clients 1 What practical and...
Read More
Family Law

Estranged husband’s consent not required for IVF treatment

The ART Act required the consent of her partner, in this case her husband, from whom she has been separated for less...
Read More
Business Law / Construction / Employment Law

September 2018 Newsletter

September 2018 Newsletter See the full newsletter here Welcome TLFC Law are pleased to welcome Min Seetoh to the...
Read More
Family Law

The long Term Impact of Separation and Divorce on Children

In the Carter & Carter [2018] FamCAFC45, the Full Court of the Family Court granted an adult child access to their...
Read More
Family Law

Not “just an agreement“: Independent Legal Advice and Financial Agreements

Each party’s lawyer must sign a Statement of Independent Legal Advice, confirming that this requirement has been met...
Read More
Family Law

Spousal Maintenance Claims and the Case of Elei & Dodt: The Importance of Crossing your T’s and Dodting your Eleis

In a recent appeal case released under the pseudonym, Elei & Dodt [2018], Justice Ryan considered whether the...
Read More